This is a debate?

Unless you agree with me, then no

So when did you measure the acceleration rates in different locations

Or do you just assume its all the same?

There is no proof its different

And everywhere I've been has been the same

So unicorns is your answer?

😄

No, same logic as what you use, there is no proof of rockets in vacuum, no proof of curvatue, no proof of spaceflight

Everything that ppl present as proof is fake

Just like any evidence of varying rate of fall is fake

I'll need proof that the rate of falling ever changes

Do you have a video of a rocket doing a maneuver inside a vacuum chamber?

Before I abide by that

That would be a good video

Like this lemme find it..

First things first citizens I would like to say we don’t have video evidence because every single video that you think is not video evidence you think it’s fake

@yue jo i do?

https://youtu.be/KBMU6l6GsdM

Yes you do

@Citizen Z Is that real or cgi?

Do you guys thought there was a fly on a spaceship when it was clearly video lag

Well maybe it is fake

@Hedwig looks real

Easily faked

Just because it was from the past doesn’t mean it’s going to be perfect

Probably true

I can't verify this video

Ok lol

I wasnt asking for your verification

I don’t have beef with you even though we get into a lot of arguments at this point but I’m just saying

But ty =)

Same here yue

OK ...

I’m going to the civil Duvet

Hedwig thinks multi kill vehicles are fake

You know what crap I’m just not gonna finish it

Im tending to side with him

@Citizen Z So argument still stands, we're constantly accelerating

Most likely in a circle, which would avoid the speed of light issue

when you get a solid acceleration rate in multiple places let me know