and the irregularity in one of there orbits allowed us to pinpoint the location of neptune

thats not irrelevent its proof that the heliocentric model the model with newtonian gravity makes predictions

theres no evidence of this

you can use the heliocentric model to find the location of neptune for yourself

if you know the maths and the equations

oooooh still doesnt prove a thing

you couldnt even give me the maths for distance of moon 😄

https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fhepweb.ucsd.edu%2Fph110b%2F110b_notes%2Fnode13.html&psig=AOvVaw3cnHfnUXRa4FJQF9Hgh69Q&ust=1582367558492000&source=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CAIQjRxqFwoTCMiSgtW44ucCFQAAAAAdAAAAABAD

😮

https://hepweb.ucsd.edu/ph110b/110b_notes/img249.png

nope

what do you mean "nope"

it has the assumption of R

R cannot be varified

rearrange for r

once you remove the assumtion whats the distance?

idfk your the one who asked for the equation I am not going to use it

neiother would I

an that isnt the distance equation neither

it uses tides you can rearrange it for the distance

you want proof that the moon is far away look at it from 2 far away distances

https://youtu.be/ieRT2k08A08?t=189

trig is what you need 😉

ngl moon looks pretty close

is it just a coincidence that the moon and sun are exactly the same size despite being 91 million miles away?

can you prove that tho

ok prove it?

🤣 thats right you don't

appeal to authority

you said you can but you didn't?

thats still an appeal to authority

its not if the results are repeatable

appeal to consensus

if you dont want to appeal to the consensus then replicate the results yourself

nobodys stopping you

fake maths equations are repeatable, oh my

fake maths equations that can predict the position of planets ok mate

you didn't give any evidence except that "it was proven international university by journals and in academic research"

you're an ignoramus

keep following on that cult without knowing why its true

its observed an measured flat