Message from @Pit Droid

Discord ID: 684351669282013187


2020-03-03 10:45:23 UTC  

@Flat Earth PhD You need to know what lens your camera is using to image the horizon. If you minimise any bending from the camera lens, you can observe the curve by compressing the image sideways to make it more noticible. Interestingly, you can see the effect cameras have on the horizon/images in general by doing this to random images picked off of Google. You will find you can see the curve in some. Some appear flat. But also some with an inverse curve.

This can be tested using a camera where you have tested the affect its lens has on an object you know to be straight.

2020-03-03 10:45:23 UTC  

U mean astronomy?

2020-03-03 10:45:53 UTC  

@Trixxle Not in this case, i'm referring to the astrological star signs (Cancer, Gemini, Taurus etc)

2020-03-03 10:46:17 UTC  

Also further proof not to trust astrology...the star signs are wrong

2020-03-03 10:46:24 UTC  

@Pit Droid I told them that but they say that's not proof cause by compressing the image you're*forcing a curve* by editing the image

2020-03-03 10:46:39 UTC  

Wat.jpg

2020-03-03 10:46:44 UTC  

there is no curve

2020-03-03 10:46:51 UTC  

the curve is a lie

2020-03-03 10:47:00 UTC  

I can notice the curve

2020-03-03 10:47:39 UTC  

The simple fact you can see feather when you're higher up proofs the curve cause you're peeking over a bit if the curve

2020-03-03 10:47:48 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484516084846952451/684351315895386147/unknown.png

2020-03-03 10:47:53 UTC  

compression shows no curve either

2020-03-03 10:48:02 UTC  

you mustve had a dodgy image 😉

2020-03-03 10:48:11 UTC  

Cause it's a too small sample of the sea

2020-03-03 10:48:17 UTC  

Given the rest of my comment...yes most likely...

2020-03-03 10:48:21 UTC  

always with your lies, sad

2020-03-03 10:48:32 UTC  

Boy oh boy

2020-03-03 10:48:53 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484516084846952451/684351590991527946/Ice_Lake.png

2020-03-03 10:48:59 UTC  

Ugh this again

2020-03-03 10:49:11 UTC  

What does that even mean

2020-03-03 10:49:12 UTC  

What was the point this exactly?

2020-03-03 10:49:14 UTC  

Yeah

2020-03-03 10:49:41 UTC  

Already debunked that about 100 times.

2020-03-03 10:50:36 UTC  

the lights across the lake were placed at one mile apart from 8 miles to 7 miles to 6 miles an still can be seen from 5 inches heighth at 8 miles distance, even the one at 8 miles distance, this cannot happen if R is 3959miles 6371km

2020-03-03 10:50:45 UTC  

The fun thing is that they have no explanation for why things happen in their flat earth "model"

2020-03-03 10:51:14 UTC  

we dont have a fiction

2020-03-03 10:51:22 UTC  

They don't have an explanation for what the sun is, why it's there, why it moves etc

2020-03-03 10:51:43 UTC  

a model is a representation of an idea

2020-03-03 10:51:48 UTC  

thats is silly

2020-03-03 10:51:48 UTC  

If only there were some kind of optical effect whereby light is distorted by the atmosphere such that it may appear to bend around a curve 🤔

2020-03-03 10:51:52 UTC  

you believe i a n idea

2020-03-03 10:52:07 UTC  

Model is a representation of reality

2020-03-03 10:52:11 UTC  

Not an idea

2020-03-03 10:52:54 UTC  

U also can't answer why a lunar eclipse happens

2020-03-03 10:53:04 UTC  

Or a solar one

2020-03-03 10:53:24 UTC  

The globe model answers all those questions

2020-03-03 10:53:30 UTC  

i belive the earth is a hoogram and you guys are npcs

2020-03-03 10:53:31 UTC  

Well, I suppose technically 🤓 a model is just some construct. However if your model fits observations and can be tested as well as can make predictions for observations, which are, correct, then your model is likely correct.

2020-03-03 10:53:34 UTC  

i am samrt

2020-03-03 10:53:40 UTC  

spr smrt