Message from @Themoopanator

Discord ID: 685139619230122032


2020-03-05 14:51:10 UTC  

i prefer holistic aproach to knowledge

2020-03-05 14:51:51 UTC  

church just like science have loads of facts but very little truth

2020-03-05 14:52:06 UTC  

Do you actually understand much physics or are you just saying that without knowing much about it?

2020-03-05 14:52:11 UTC  

I'm not sure I follow, could you elaborate?

2020-03-05 14:54:25 UTC  

im have only below average knoweldge about physics

2020-03-05 14:54:50 UTC  

That's pretty honest of you

2020-03-05 14:54:55 UTC  

But, really? Below average

2020-03-05 14:54:55 UTC  

Indeed

2020-03-05 14:54:58 UTC  

what do you consider to be average?

2020-03-05 14:56:37 UTC  

bachelor in physics is average i would say

2020-03-05 14:57:02 UTC  

my problem is that basic claims are nonsensical

2020-03-05 14:57:18 UTC  

I don't think the average person has a bachelor in physics but I understand what you're saying

2020-03-05 14:57:22 UTC  

what are the nonsensical claims?

2020-03-05 14:57:33 UTC  

so the higher concepts are even more retard*d

2020-03-05 14:57:44 UTC  

for example that nothing exploded

2020-03-05 14:57:49 UTC  

wdym?

2020-03-05 14:59:16 UTC  

big bang

2020-03-05 14:59:27 UTC  

Firstly, I don't think the big bang counts as "basic physics"

2020-03-05 14:59:36 UTC  

secondly, no physicist would ever say that

2020-03-05 14:59:56 UTC  

The idea that "nothing exploded" is a popularisation of the theory for people who don't study physics.

2020-03-05 15:00:14 UTC  

"nothing" is not a well-defined physical concept

2020-03-05 15:00:25 UTC  

there was nothing and then there was unimaginable amount of energy and matter

2020-03-05 15:00:38 UTC  

Yeah, physicists don't actually know how all of that happened

2020-03-05 15:00:43 UTC  

Yeah

2020-03-05 15:00:43 UTC  

It's not "nothing"

2020-03-05 15:00:52 UTC  

Again, this is a popularisation of the theory, not the actual theory.

2020-03-05 15:01:10 UTC  

the fact that nothing has to be defined shows you how mentally corrupt theoretical physicist are

2020-03-05 15:01:20 UTC  

How?

2020-03-05 15:01:25 UTC  

Physicists don't use "nothing"

2020-03-05 15:01:29 UTC  

they don't talk about "nothing"

2020-03-05 15:01:31 UTC  

Some of the hypothesis include 'time' as something that needed to form, so a 'begining'isn't a relevant question in that model

2020-03-05 15:01:40 UTC  

They talk about things like time, distance, speed, mass, etc

2020-03-05 15:02:07 UTC  

yes

2020-03-05 15:02:14 UTC  

fro example spacetime

2020-03-05 15:02:22 UTC  

spacetime does not exist

2020-03-05 15:02:35 UTC  

The only widely accepted view is that tracing the history of the universe backwards reveals that matter expanded from a point. But that doesn't mean that literally nothing existed.

2020-03-05 15:02:36 UTC  

Also bare in mind that that's one of the very edges of understanding, so naturally there'll be things which don't make sense

2020-03-05 15:02:38 UTC  

yet modern theoretical physics is based on it

2020-03-05 15:02:48 UTC  

What do you mean spacetime doesn't exist?

2020-03-05 15:02:52 UTC  

What makes you say spacetime doesn't exist?

2020-03-05 15:02:54 UTC  

We're living in it *right now*