your glob model needs a PHYSICAL horizon

Refraction happens perfectly well regardless of the shape of the earth

which is why ships disappear

according to you the glob model has a physical horizon

this is determined by R

this is NOT observed

ergo no R no ball

No. You dot understand the effect refraction has on the apparent position of the physical horizon...

we do, this is the problem

you dont know what types there are

you dont know you NEED a physical horizon

so, what do ships disappear over???

No, you need me to have one to propagate your narrative...

see, a physical water bulge, yeah?

The apparent position of the horizon. This isn't hard. If the horizon is projected to 7 miles away then a boat which tables more than 7 miles away will be seen to disappear.

*moves

you cannot say apparent position and horizon, thats a tautology

On another day, the horizon may be projected only.to 4 miles

thats a flat earth argument

welcome to flat earth Pit 🙂

Only if you utterly fail to understand the point I'm making

oh i understqand, i think you do not though, but hey ho, not all will comprehend 🙂

@Pit Droid

You just cant say refraction

Refraction is the cause of all those effects

because you dont know what refraction is

Lol

Literslly says that on your link dude, if you don't believe me...

how much refraction is there in a cold climate vs a hot cliamte

do you know?

Depends on the temperature gradient at the location, the air pressure and the temperature at the location of your observation.

& you just can't say refraction you have to speak about witch refraction your referencing to @Pit Droid

So do you mean over land or sea?

over sea

Hey

One type of refraction. Refraction is just a thing. If you are asking what type of 'mirage effect' then I guess superior.

do you know Snells Law?

In both cases over sea you would expect the sea to be a lower temperature than the air. This should extend your sight range in the same way I described above.