go

> can you show me evidence of this?
@Logrian sorry, i believe i asked you first. care for not using "tu quoque" in a discussion? you aren't making a point at all.

this isnt a 'discussion

all those things have been proven time and again 😉

it's an education 😉

and it's free!

so lets start with ships, we'll go s-l-o-ow k

what do they go over?

discussion
/dɪˈskʌʃ(ə)n/
noun
the action or process of talking about something in order to reach a decision or to exchange ideas.
"the committee acts as a forum for discussion"
a conversation or debate about a specific topic.
plural noun: discussions
"discussions about environmental improvement"

right, stop being a recalcitrant lil oik and answer

Do you even know your own glob model?

i asked you to deliver proof for your point. you're just using "tu quoque" to avoid the fact you don't have anything to support your ish besides some dumb "memes"

wow

so difficult you cannot answer

NEXT!

you're exactly proving my point.

Youre real dumb kid, youll fail upwards like all the rest 😉

https://www.skeptic.com/insight/flat-earth-conspiracy-theory/?gclid=CjwKCAjwmKLzBRBeEiwACCVihhChf9jbIOCJXYBRoxrlMnV3WWBwZmpajHe3kfgh6QicVHX1eRB5bxoCCIIQAvD_BwE but if you insist

if you dont know your own glob model when I demolish it how will you know 😮 😉

so, lets try again

he's a troll

#timewaste

Do ships go over the geometric horizon as to why they disappear, y or n ?

> Youre real dumb kid, youll fail upwards like all the rest 😉
@Logrian if i'm so dumb, would you care for giving me actual evidence for your point?

see? ^^

I rest my case

Do ships go over the geometric horizon as to why they disappear, y or n ?

ships disappear out of view because of the curve.

so you assert a physical ball horizon k

if the earth was flat, you'd see everything your line of sight since there's nothing that hides it. but you can't since it disappears in the distance due to the curve. at first sight it doesn't look like there is a curve, but in the way objects come and go from the distance, you see there that the top point of that object is the first and last thing you see.

you agree its a PHYSICAL horizon yes?

lmao you're just gonna put in some twisted "logic" that wouldn't even make sense to proof your "point". that image proves my point btw

i'm not gonna waste any more time on this. you're not gonna give me some proper evidence because clearly you don't have any

so by yiour logic you can tell me where that physical horizon is with the observer height, yes?