Message from @Rotmistrz

Discord ID: 306263780021633024


2017-04-25 03:00:40 UTC  

exactly how the fuck are they "scientists" when they havent contributed to science?

2017-04-25 03:00:49 UTC  

they are purely pundits

2017-04-25 03:01:41 UTC  

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^666

2017-04-25 03:01:46 UTC  

No sixes

2017-04-25 03:01:49 UTC  

Only sevens

2017-04-25 03:01:53 UTC  

literally hes an engineer

2017-04-25 03:01:58 UTC  

was never a scientist

2017-04-25 03:02:06 UTC  

then he stopped being engineer

2017-04-25 03:02:10 UTC  

to become actor

2017-04-25 03:02:11 UTC  

for the show

2017-04-25 03:02:15 UTC  

I have mad respect for engineers

2017-04-25 03:02:19 UTC  

we all know

2017-04-25 03:02:19 UTC  

Can't believe he quit that..

2017-04-25 03:02:28 UTC  

but not engineers who larp as scientists

2017-04-25 03:02:32 UTC  

he quit it to be bill nye the science guy in the show

2017-04-25 03:02:37 UTC  

sjw (((scientists)))

2017-04-25 03:02:40 UTC  

then now hes trying to get political

2017-04-25 03:02:45 UTC  

hes a fucken fag these days

2017-04-25 03:02:51 UTC  

now? he's always been political

2017-04-25 03:02:55 UTC  

yeah

2017-04-25 03:02:55 UTC  

tucker also didnt know how to frame the question properly

2017-04-25 03:03:02 UTC  

he should have used an example

2017-04-25 03:03:08 UTC  

yeah he fell into the shill's trap

2017-04-25 03:03:08 UTC  

global warming, he's said we need to lock up "deniers"

2017-04-25 03:03:16 UTC  

like if the planet was globally increasing by 1 degree celsius

2017-04-25 03:03:17 UTC  

i thought that was an easy question to answer

2017-04-25 03:03:25 UTC  

the way he framed it

2017-04-25 03:03:25 UTC  

how much of it would be humana ctivity

2017-04-25 03:03:29 UTC  

but im sure he could have done better

2017-04-25 03:03:34 UTC  

either way

2017-04-25 03:03:37 UTC  

the question he made

2017-04-25 03:03:39 UTC  

the shill's strategy is always the same. reduce an argument to an appeal to popular thought

2017-04-25 03:03:40 UTC  

was answerable

2017-04-25 03:03:41 UTC  

and then bill could have said something like

2017-04-25 03:03:49 UTC  

78% of that is human activity

2017-04-25 03:04:00 UTC  

and 22% is climate changing naturally

2017-04-25 03:04:08 UTC  

and it woudlve been settled

2017-04-25 03:04:41 UTC  

nigor

2017-04-25 03:05:02 UTC  

he could have said cows fly but it doesn't change the fact that it's bullshit

2017-04-25 03:05:04 UTC  

i think he should have said, i grant the climate is changing, now why implement policy that will only reduce humanity's ability to deal with it?

2017-04-25 03:05:17 UTC  

nice way to put it