They just had thick armor and could be built cheaply

Reliability was a massive factor. Hence the Sherman was a stellar machine for what it was needed for

The T-34 didnt have a pin to hold the track in place, so it has a slopped bit of armor on the sides to knock the holders back into place

Probe to spalling and cracking easily with ap rounds

More so than the German or other allied tanks.

@soup dad simple and effective.

Prone*

Didn’t the oil and air filters need to be changed on a weekly basis?

@Data Pagan every few days.

Air filters were gash.

Did it even HAVE air filters?

so often that most the time the tank was fucked before you replaced it

yeah the maintaince list for a T-34 was fucking awful

You had so much shit to do

@Dimorac OI

I GOT ME HAIR DONE

I’m not a naziphile but the Panzer III/IV were rock solid tanks

Not gonna give the Tiger any credit since it was too expensive and got stuck pretty easily

Im a naziphile

A little

Those uniforms are kinda hot okay

Thing is because t-34s were made slightly different in other factories most parts couldn't interchange with each other.

In like a forbidden taboo way

The Panzer 3/4 were nice to use, effective, and had good vision

there is nothing wrong with them other than the relatively light armor

Shout out to STUG IIIs and their variants.

It doesnt look too bad

The cut

but the Panzer IV almost had the same frontal armor as a Tiger

Looks decent if i wear make up

just needed a 20mm plate bolted on

Stug was built on the panzer 3 wasn’t it?

hihi

@soup dad yep

@Data Pagan aye brilliant chassis

Just casemate design

The jagdpanzer IV was also pretty sleek

Scrolling thourgh Metroidvania tag I find this

https://store.steampowered.com/app/361600/Luna_Sky/

What year did they put the high velocity cannon on the pfzIV?

43?