<:facepalm:639100046398324737>

imagine?

gods law

theres clear guidelines

I'm talking about instead of having just religious laws we follow coupled with civic laws, just combine the two

im thinking the state has its laws and the individual has his law

again

Christian Shariah

idk bout that

Imagine how badly we could flex on the Muslims

politics are distinct from mysticism

@Erstanden the fact that they go to hell is enough of a flex

💪🏻

I mean just imagine some Haji fucks want to bomb a church right, they do that and not only did they piss off that one sect, but they angered the Theocracy of that One State which is pretty much (in this example) all of the European Catholic Countries.

so they just brought down upon them the combined might of all of Catholicism

or if they did that in the Balkans and they now have to deal with The Entirety of the Orthodox Faith

that would be based

anything like that would cause a genocide of mudskinism

or if the IDF started shit in the United States the United Churches of America (since it would be a system where each denomination has their own main land and can vote on civic laws), you would see protestants, methodists, and calvinists go full Remove Hannukah

it would be

nice

would be

wont happen

don't underestimate the power of the menorah

or retarded boomers

it's so weird
everybody knows that something is wrong, people point fingers to the right groups but not the group that's really behind it.
Like they know it's feminists, globalists, socialist, communists, the rich,etc. but they don't want to look beyond those masks.

The best tactic is to hide in plain sight

it's like they have some kind of lock against drawing the last few lines.

Because the tactic works so good

How could the same people showing you the enemy control the enemy?

<@&588707615643795456> Daily Question ✝️

**-** What is your view on interpretation of scripture? Who is allowed / has the authority to interpret, is interpretation infallible, how can you know a specific interpretation is correct? Elaborate and explain

Interpretations are to be considered valid if the interpreter is credible

Or if they make sense

@OrthoGoat What makes an interpreter credible?

Is "making sense" subjective, different things make sense to different peoples?

Seems like whoever can persuade the most people of their interpretation wins the game

Nah it's not subjective

It either follows logic or it dosent

Also simple of they have a history of studying theology then they are more credible

The truest interpretation of Christianity lies somewhere in between how the gnostics interpretted it and the literal instructions Jesus gave for his followers to follow

I know it's correct because I'm an occultist: if you interpret satanic or non Christian texts with a Christian perspective it opens the information up to you with new meaning