Message from @OrthoGoat
Discord ID: 688538628829478977
we know abrahamic religion is evil
it's a fact
no need to continue saying it
which one?
Judaism?
id agree
pagans literally think its okay to kill babies and rape children
but abrahamic religons are evil?
nigga you clownin
<:totenkopf:668582415849226270>
Christianity isnt evil neither is islam
🤡
paganism is a very broad word
nope
depends on what meaning we are using
it describes people on discord
so you are a pagan
no
discord pagans
ye
i hate pagans
no one is a pagan naturally
well, the Etsy ones exist
i refuse to accept that as factual
but most are mid-aged lesbians who have not been successful with men
so they make a living selling fake crystals and rock salt to gullible femoids on Etsy
> no one is a pagan naturally
@OrthoGoat its not like paganism had to be beaten out of europe over the course of a millennia or anything and replaced with christianity
@Tekka naturally, the people worshipping cum drinkers isnt natural
the whole "odin is a cum drinker" comes from a book written by a jew called david greenberg which is based on really poor translations of old texts. either way nordic paganism isnt the only type of paganism @OrthoGoat
not an argument cry more
literally is
@kappu Black magic and bad people exist. No matter what cut of cloth they wear.
no
u just sad its a bad translation without proof
Murder edgy rick and morty nihilist
More annoying than runecoons or atheist
"Greenberg bases it on a reference to this one article, called "Runes, Mandrakes and Gallows", written by Jeannine Talley. She grossly misunderstands the Old Norse language in Hávamál 141 and arbitrarily asserts that frævask ~ frævaz(k) is a noun (!) that means 'cum'. Frævask is a verb. This is not only morphologically obvious but it is also crystal clear from the context. It is beyond dispute." The book that states odin is a cum guzzler is David F. Greenberg, The Construction of Homosexuality, on p. 248. Go suck a cock christcuck @Sentient23
so what does "Frævask" mean as a verb? also what evidence did he give that it doesnt mean what he says it means
this isnt proof lmao this is just someone else asserting your point