Message from @Maksim
Discord ID: 676854329398919187
Who the fuck is wetransfer
There's even a case to be made that Paypal could show that it's a powerful system to be used in its early days that could as well take on the multi billion industry of banking transfers.
You think it's possible to disrupt the big 3 mobile providers?
LMAO ok
i meant that transferwise i always get them two mixed up
The real branches of government are corporate, military, and Hollywood
yeah that's like some retard saying you think it's possible to disrupt the banking system
LMAO ok
Not in any meaningful way
but yet they did and banks had to catch up
To truly disrupt them you'd have to use government
and at quite a hefty profit and offered a good competitive advantage
And create a single public central bank
With 80% min cash reserve
lmao
look your point was that no one could disrupt or enter the arena with a multi billion dollar competitor. I provided you examples that it's possible. I don't know what else do you need to have your eyes opened.
All public utilities should be nationalized
Banking is not as expensive to enter
Retard
I've also shown you examples of a telecommunications company entering the field lmao
Your argument in correlation with banking was that you can't compete with a multi billion company due to banks taking all adspace which as shown by the examples does not hold any water to it.
A local provider near me was giving rather good deals near me a few years back
Much cheaper than tmobile or any other
I did not say the argument with adspace
As it was already stated a smaller provider has a complete ability to either sell or not to sell. It is completely on their conciousness
Illiterate fuck
Not if it's a public company
A larger business can just buy 51% of voting stock
the argument stated that if you start competing with a multi billion company you will not be able to advertise against them because of their budget
Well the issue with that is that you can just hold onto that 51%. If needed you can even issue more stock which will mean that their stake will lose. There are plenty of ways to war off the so called Corporate Raiders who try to buy out companies this way.
It's not the 80s anymore that it is some kind of significant issue.
also i don't get what your argument with your local provider was supposed to mean.
Did it get closed down? Or did it raise their prices?
Your argumentation strikes me as incoherent anon
"bro no you will be made to sell your company straight away for 30 billion $ 😔"
They got forced out of business
All the providers in the local area here lowered their prices with "special deals" and paying off contracts
Local went out of business
Deals ended
Prices when up