Which part of that sentence

that there is a hateful rhetoric towards the gays

unless we see Indonesia style sharia squads I'm not buying it.

There is lmao

I've seen so many individuals hating on gays

Which is good imo

then why isn't there a mass revolt?

A stark contrast to 3 years ago

@Ronin because there isn't anyone organizing it

what about major people speaking up?

It's a loose collective that is realising the dangers of the globalhomo

@Ronin Optics

Even if the majority don't support lgbt a vocal minority has historically been what drives change

And mass media and elites still overwhelming support lgbt

so what you're saying is that we will see major changes in the next few years

So one who spoke out would likely be crucified by his own people

@Ronin Gradual accelerating change

Exponential change

Not sudden

I just hope it won't be too late

The 20's will be a time of intense polarization

I genuinely feel bad for some of the transgenders.
A lot of them decided to get surgery done on a whim

This is similar to the 1920's, where there was intense political polarization

And crossdressing and homosexuality flourished

I hope you're right

Just read history

During the 1920's

There was a huge amount of crossdressers and homosexuals

what about the migrants?
the 1920's weren't swamped with subsaharan ghouls.
do you think there will be a backlash against that as well?

yeah I read about it.
also the Berlin wild boys.

There was a lot of migration in the 20's

Just inter-european migration

And the Arab population is against lgbt

More so than the average white

So it just plays into it

so what would be the course of action?
ally with the Arabs because they're against the LGBT or ally with the LGBT because they're against the arabs?
I personally don't like either option.

Ally with the Arabs

Mussolini was very close with the Arab Muslims

The Arabs have the capacity to respect that each people should have their own place

The LGBT cult does not

I don't think the current crop shares that ideal.