Of course it would be debunked

It is filled with truth

Like I said read it

Don’t follow what others say read it yourself and compare

Found it

I love how there's no mention of actual contents of those on wikipedia, just history, debunking and shit.

Theres an image of the article from 1921 in this newer article

"Structure and content" contains just keywords.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2016/10/28/insider/1920-21-exposing-the-protocols-as-a-fraud.amp.html

Read the book

Don’t read the article

Ok freak out and deny evidence

What is your problem with reading it

You can paint events to anything

I dont care enough

But you care enough to put other people down for bringing it up

The article i linked is a lot shorter

Go read that and the original one

“No don’t read the book read something saying how bad it is”

Except it proves its a forgery by the tsarist secret police?

I’m going to guess you come from Jewish lineage

Im actually cornish

And not religious in the monotheistic sense

@calico read the article, it doesnt show any actual evidence just makes claims, the news paper articvle from 1920 that it shows is too small to read but the part that is legible essentially reiterates what the rest of the article said, clearly youve read neither this article nor the PEOZ

Look, EoZ was fabricated (my belief), but Bird urges you to read it. Notice that being fabrication doesn't mean it's completely baseless. Even fabrication should be rooted in *some* truth, or at least prejuices.

I have actual useful theory to read

You started fighting over EoZ instead of discussing.

theory lol

Also it links to the scanned old article somewhere on there

Just doesnt work for me cus mobile

yeah which you have to pay to read

Find it on archive or something

Actually ill do that for you

Phone too slow, find it yourself

I mean, if you're attempting to convince someone that EoZ is fake, I'm sure that there's better ways than 100 years old newspaper? Or should it be considered oddity?

The article is still relevant

@AsdfgQwert it would be good if it provided actual evidence and not just claims

I am aware there is bias in the book I am aware not everything is truthful

Read the 1921 article that new one is just rehashing it for unaware ppl

Reading it and comparing it to the modern day politics is eye opening and I recommend it

Read the book