What’s the point you’re trying to prove

EoZ is bs and you can paint events however you want

What does EoZ stand for, even?

You haven’t read the book you can’t make that claim

Protocols of the elders of Zion @Koninos

Ohhh.

Read the 1921 article

Yeah, it's quite cringe.

I haven't read it, but I've read about it.

I recommend it

Take what you can from it like anything in life

What does it have to offer, other than proposing that the Jews are planning to dominate the world?

We are planning to dominate the world 😈

Gives insight to some of the inner workings of Zionism

The thing is, conspiracy theories and books like EoZ, mix some truth with a lot of lies, and create some sort of believable propaganda.

https://archive.org/details/TheProtocolsOfTheLearnedEldersOfZion/mode/2up

Yes take what you can from it read and compare

Find the truth

I don't think this book will change my mind, really.

> In 1921, The Times of London published three articles written by the newspaper's Constantinople (now Istanbul) correspondent, Philip Graves, which showed that the Protocols had been extensively plagiarized from a book by a French lawye r and writer named Maurice Joly. The book by Joly was called (in French) Dialogues in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu. It was published in Brussels (Belgium) in 1864 (with a Geneva imprint, although the edition I have seen is dated 1868 and has a Brussels imprint). Cohn notes (p 74-5): "In all, over 160 passages in the Protocols, totaling two-fifths of the entire text, are clearly based on passages in Joly; in nine of the chapters the borrowings amount to more than half the text, in some they amount to three-quarters, in one (Protocol VII) to almost the entire text. This should be enough to demonstrate that plagiarism occurred.
Sounds easy, verify Dialogues in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu existed before EoZ and read it.

I was unaware of this I will look into it thanks

http://robscholtemuseum.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Dialogue-in-Hell-between-Machiavelli-and-Montesquieu.pdf

For any who want to read

I will be skimming through it

Anyways, always think outside of the box.
> These Dialogues were a political satire directed at the government of Napoleon III in France, during the Second Empire. Joly was given 15 months in prison by this government for his satirical effort. The author or authors of the Protocols, so far as they were plagiarized from the Dialogues, substituted Jews where Joly had (non-Jewish) members of the government of Napoleon III.
Maurice Joly could make some good taking-over-the-World observations for sake of good satire and worldbuilding. If jews are indeed trying to take over the World, it's reasonable to expect some of those "predictions" to be valid.

Or they liked EoZ and are LARPing.

As example, Paul Joseph Watson, guy probably popular in some right wing circles, made a video about how similar the current SJW thing is to the events described in RPG gamebook "Cyberpunk 2020": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBT621ygQEo

Cyberpunk 2020 is p fun

2077 is based off of it

• A male convicted of rape can have his conviction dismissed by marrying his victim.
• Muslim men have sexual rights to any woman/girl not wearing the Hijab

Disturbing truths.^

What of them?

He probably meant to paste it on Europe. We've been having Islam Hating Hour.

Lol.

Islam has no place In Europe

Non Europeans have no place in Europe

Yes

That includes Americans

Would you make the same claim for afrikaners

American tourists can piss off

Afrikaners are ethnic Dutch