Theirs cooks
Or people who have been offered food for free?
Again, you're just omitting huge details.
You can't just justify your claim by putting people in two boxes.
Well we can combine them
People who get homes are better
People who are fed I better
I Hope we can all agree on that
Yes.
People who are fed and have homes aslo seem to be better in this society
Lets extend that to everyone so everyone is better
And these apartments would have free utilities and what not
The other needs
Like a bathroom
And water
Get to the point.
We should give people thier needs for free
And the other stuff
Can be done by worker coops
Although the state buisness will be run like worker coops
Sounds good in theory, but it can cause huge problems. Economical and political problems.
Just that their goals are pre decided
My point still stands.
I'm still not sure how that answers my question
Both sides will abuse the situation.
like why work if you get free stuff?
most people aren't exactly driven to do things
How does giving people free food cause economic problems
oh I have experience with this
Because you get paid?
you can't give people free shit
I get payed by the government
free housing and food
Because in third word countries, food and homes are limited.
And their are ways to motivate people
if I didn't want to leave the country I could just kick back and receive free food
like guns?
There's a reason people are dying in Africa.
Look at the army
The governments don't keep houses for themselves.
