No they dont

@sweatercowsandsass but the definition is based off of an objective claim and observation. I personally don't know enough about it to make a claim and try force it on others. For me it should be when there is brain function.

Gmo> overuse of toxins and antibiotics.

@Octavia yeah exactly, i'd be the same

I would not want to have to raise a child if i cant provide a good start to it.

Just being selfish to do so.

The window for abortion has it so the foetus is not devolved enough, it's like taking an egg from a chicken.

Breeding for the point lf it

@Spork molk either way, the way I see it is if you can still terminate a pregnancy, its not a child *yet*

its a solution for india for now, its helping them not die

Yeah it's not a baby or a child.

trials seem to be very promising

It is a foetus.

We need post birth abortions.

we wont know until 30 years from now

Post birth abortions

cant really test for something that far in advance sadly

Each to there own I guess @sweatercowsandsass, just live and let live

or maybe we will find a way

Everyone deserves a fighting chance. Those who are aborted just weren't strong enough.

@The Last MethBender <:whitey:467822735624765441>

We should be able to abort a 6 week old baby if we want to.

hold on there big man

That's just assisted suicide Potato.

By feeding them to pitbulls.

i believe in maximum freedom so i dont set limits on abortion

The ones that survice will grow strong.

do you boo boo

Agree with ya there TShirt.

its on your moral conscience to decide

not mine

As long as the person who wants to get the abortion pays for it, then go nuts

^

shits pricey

THAT

like 650

its 500

There's only one proper way to terminate a pregnancy and that is a round of illegal boxing fueled with vodka

in ATL was 650

so are you saying us who were born early are a product of natural selection ?