Message from @GeorgyBoyo
Discord ID: 678089961526001664
No it's not hazardous. They have to stop sometimes and they cant stop fast enough.
It's not about fault, it's about responding to suddenly changing situations
Cutting someone up creates a hazard?
Being able to quickly react to everchanging situations while driving is mandatory.
If you cant react fast enough you dont get to drive. The same law applies to young drivers.
The older driver becomes a second hazard in addition to the asshole
Again we fall back to statistics, if older people are so incapable why don't they crash more than the fit, young, capable people?
They do
Actuarial tables don't lie
And also you're right, if a young person isn't paying attention and crashed into a guy who cut them up, the guy who cut them up is still at fault
Link?
Go find them. They're everywhere. It's well known that insurance rates go up when you get past a certain age
They go up, but the highest bracket by far is under 20s
It's high when you start driving and again goes back to high as you get older
And I mean by far
He disparity is that elderly drivers are more likely to die themselves in a car crash, whether at fault or not
Because the elderly are simply more frail
A crash that a younger person can easily survive is not so survivable for an elderly person
Yes
Not only the elderly are a danger to others but to themselves because of old age
@LOGiK if you ride a motorcycle you should realize that fault aside an accident is still an accident
It's the teenagers choice to not be high and do drugs. He can prevent it.
Regardless of who’s at fault
Theres almost always more than 1 party at fault
That isn't true either what
Accidents always suck
so preventing them is the best way possible, elderly should be retested every time they renew their licence
And under 20s shouldn't be allowed licenses then
In fact, speed limits should all be 20mph too
You'd get almost 0 fatal collisions if the most anyone drove at was 20mph
Max closing speed in a crash would be 40, there is a high survivability from that, especially in modern cars
And that would only be in the rare case of a head on
Also, with all seriousness
I think most elderly people would just say fuck you and drive anyway
They wouldn't bother to prove their competence and would just carry on driving, probably uninsured
They can be arrested <:pepe_smug:560207654207750154>
which is lucky for me, it's illegal to drive a car without insurance
Are they even gonna care?
You arrest them, schedule a court date, they get fined and carry on
Eventually maybe they get jailtime