It's the teenagers choice to not be high and do drugs. He can prevent it.

Regardless of who’s at fault

Theres almost always more than 1 party at fault

That isn't true either what

Accidents always suck

so preventing them is the best way possible, elderly should be retested every time they renew their licence

And under 20s shouldn't be allowed licenses then

In fact, speed limits should all be 20mph too

You'd get almost 0 fatal collisions if the most anyone drove at was 20mph

Max closing speed in a crash would be 40, there is a high survivability from that, especially in modern cars

And that would only be in the rare case of a head on

Also, with all seriousness

I think most elderly people would just say fuck you and drive anyway

They wouldn't bother to prove their competence and would just carry on driving, probably uninsured

They can be arrested <:pepe_smug:560207654207750154>

which is lucky for me, it's illegal to drive a car without insurance

Are they even gonna care?

You arrest them, schedule a court date, they get fined and carry on

Eventually maybe they get jailtime

Maybe

By which time you'll have had a rise in uninsured driver collisions

Forever ban them from driving a vehicle

And they ignore it

oh they will start caring when there's no money for bingo and the meat raffle

Execute them?

Ok Stalin

If they gonna commit terrorism then I mean

I don't think driving without a license is terrorism

It is when you've been told by every sane person that you're a danger to yourself and people around you when you drive

it's not terrorism, it need to political in nature to class it as that

Well that's what people tell drug addicts

They still shoot up

Drugs addicts shouldn't be able to drive either?

Still not terrorism

I'm saying using illegal drugs isn't terrorism despite them being a danger to themselves and society

Do your drugs in your home. Keep the elderly in their homes.

So driving without a license isn't either

Waving a loaded gun around NYC while drunk also isn't terrorism unless there is a terrorist motive behind it

An elderly person unfit to drive responsibly is the same as a person under the influence. Both of them make it so they're incapable of driving responsibly.

You're kinda wrong there

The way the law works regarding intoxication is that it is voluntary, thus the outcome of behaviour while intoxicated has been chosen