So it's a pretty bad argument

It works against trans people but that's a whole other story

If you defend yourself under modern Christian interpretation, you've technically sinned.

Because Christians suck at translating shit.

`while forgetting that the majority of those beliefs were inherited from Judaism to start with.
`
<:HonkHonk:566814473646768128>

Gay: asks for more "rights" at the expense of everyone else. Because it will never be enough

What rights?

@EnderOctanus no you don't understand, christianity has nothing to do with judaism

according to fitzy

its actually Privilages but if you tell them that they say you are homophobic

10 Commandments. Dare him to deny God.

@unfriendly teapot

Yeah it is disgusting for me but I just don't look

I mean, yeah, but can't that be due to social conditioning?

Yes

@😝JIK Bleach😜 what privelegs do they want?

All of them probably

And more than you especially

Like I'm not talking about trans bullshit here

To teach your very young kids how ok gay is and that they sould be aswell

But what if gay actually is okay?

@unfriendly teapot anyway, as far as I've read, the only animals which will practice exclusive homosexuality (that is, having no interest in mating with the opposite sex, when they're plentifully available) are the domestic sheep and humans

I think the contention is that it shouldn't be taught that you SHOULD be gay, instead of that you CAN be gay.

so the data from that pic is false?

many animals will engage in homosexual sex from time to time, but this doesn't make them homosexual like people are homosexual

dogs are the most well known example, they'll mount anything

so is engaging in homosexual sex frlm time to time okay?

well, natural != okay

<:cleanyourroom:429612328192049152>

you can at least claim that it's natural though if you want

It's pretty natural to rape your partner.

but like dolphins form rape gangs and go around raping baby dolphins from other pods

so idk if you want to hang your hat on natural-ness

If goodness followed nature, then people would not need to be taught how to be good.

okay but why isn't the argument about biological purpose valid?

yeah I'm not trying to appeal to nature here

It doesn't serve one that we know of. Just happens.

It's most likely just incidental.

well the adoptipm thing

I mean the homosexuality did evolve for some reason?

Can maybe be chocked up as "response to stronger than normal primal urg" ?