BAN HIM BAN HIM QUICK!

They were there?

No

Inproper yitdish use but o

k

This was years and years before

They probably were not there

Not very concerned with speaking proper yiddish to be honest

https://carm.org/when-were-gospels-written-and-by-whom

Your speculation is not an argument

if you do not know how to use it then don't....

I'll do as I please

https://goo.gl/Yh6Ymv

>the guardian

>Fox News

Still more reliable than a 2,000 year old book

I don't read Fox news

I doupt you read in general but ok

Typical, the Jews have our King crucified and have the audacity to claim the cross is a symbol of THEIR oppression.

good grief

What proof do you have that he is actually the son of god, and that we did it?

The gospels themselves are very reliable and the disciples had no reason to lie

The link you sent is using the bible to prove that the bible was written by the people who were there

So claims?

Valid claims, yes.

Claims based off of claims ok

No, claims of eye witnesses.

from whoom?

@Obungus names lmao

Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.

ok then, did they say that we killed him?

also even if we did, is the intire race inferior for the rest of time?

They hold the account that I have been claiming. They had the Romans kill Jesus because they saw him as a blasphemer.

no

Like I also said earlier, jews are not bad because they are jews.

Note that the bible has been altered over the years and that the bible was not originally written in English. So many of the statements are different from the original statements.

Cheif we did not have great romans....

Jews just have a unique clash with Christianity

The only alterations come from the newer translations

like the (((NIV)))

https://goo.gl/EJ2geG