You can't just make a wild speculation and pass it off as fact

Isn't that what you are doing when saying Jews killed Jesus as a fact?

It is still heavily disputed

no

the disputes are weakly founded

unless you can invalidate the Gospels your argument holds little weight

"Jesus was crucified as a Jewish victim of Roman violence. On this, all written authorities agree. A Gentile Roman governor, Pontius Pilate, condemned him to death and had him tortured and executed by Gentile Roman soldiers. "

This is from a christian site

So it's disputed even among christians

The Bible says otherwise

That is your interpretation of the bible

no

It is clearly stated

Matthew 27:24-26 King James Version (KJV)

24 When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye to it.

25 Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children.

26 Then released he Barabbas unto them: and when he had scourged

Most Christians don't even believe this lmao

How can you interpret that as Pilate being the one to go out of his way to torture Jesus?

so?

Does the majority opinion now define truth?

I have no clue what a "Pilate" is

Well then you really have no business discussing this verse

@Obungus Totally did not report you to T7S

Trust&Safety

want a cookie?

Jesus was a Jew, all his followers were Jewish

So if Jews did kill him, most of them were not in support

Yeah

perhaps not

So?

It was not a matter of religion

Like I said, Jews are not inherently bad.

Them being Jewish had nothing to do with it

@Obungus I have discord hypesquad, so my account is verfied, my reports matter

real cool pal

I am trying to have a discussion here, please stop pinging me :)

Ok

This debate

So it was the people not liking Jesus that killed him. Not them being Jews

Yes

Most Jews were in favor of Jesus

the pharisees

well no