Message from @Scholarly Wisent
Discord ID: 445459297699233793
It is one cause of many of our problems.
Which class should see enhanced profits?
My argument isn't on which class should see their dominance of society form.
Also youre going to have to elaborate on the Venezuela and Chile point
well u 2 have fun, I gotta work on my economy simulator
Its minecraft btw
Gross
But I guarantee, its really fun
Hey its an economy server
Capitalists in Chile and abroad immediately reacted with a violent coup against the state forming a brutal dictatorship under Pinochet.
When leftists in Venezuela barely saw their success, foreign and internal Capitalism took every chance to sabotage the country.
As an example for Venezuela
Hiding food from store shelves.
If you think Hillary and Trump represent anyting really different, you have deluded yourselves.
In the end, the song of the American poor exists in the blood of both parties.
Agreed
Ew
Ew?
Nazis are like extreme Trots. In the end they say they support the worker but their biggest ally has always been the Capitslists.
Cool opinion
At least Trots have the decency to ask for some change.
Are national socialists allowed here?
Because from what i see, im guessing no? I might be wrong.
They are
Just not welcome by some people lol
Anyways, gtg
Continuing what I said <#402338028523094018>
Pretending you can wait for the racist antiracist debate is foolish. You are either a racist or you oppose racism fully. The middle ground does not exist.
You aren't a part-racist because you like asians but hate blacks, you are a racist.
You side with racism when you choose to wait around and say nothing or do nothing about it.
There is no discussion and this centrist nonsense that we should choose inaction and wait is idealist as hell.
You side with racism when you do this.
ah. no
it's contextual
completely motivation based as well
There is no context to the racist or anti-racist stance aside from the background that led to the belief.
Saying that is excusing racism.
It's the most Liberal thing ever lol.
No. That is the height of retardism. Everything has context
The context being what caused the belief.
The only context possible.
And guess what, there is no excuse.
I don't care if an exploitative billionaire was once a poor orphan, they are an exploitative billionaire. The context exists but it provides no excuse for the actions.
?