Message from @IИVДLID CЯΞДΓIФИ

Discord ID: 473993654369779732


2018-07-31 23:18:13 UTC  

👌

2018-07-31 23:18:15 UTC  

"how ever many you want there to be"

2018-07-31 23:18:40 UTC  

uhhh

2018-07-31 23:18:42 UTC  

2

2018-07-31 23:19:07 UTC  

off topic comment, but i just surpassed 700 on insta, so congrats to me

2018-07-31 23:19:19 UTC  

Trump should just under go a sex change and be a woman to become to the first girl president of the united states

2018-07-31 23:19:22 UTC  

all to own the libs

2018-07-31 23:19:32 UTC  

and hillary

2018-07-31 23:19:50 UTC  

thought that rank said "obunga loving libtard"

2018-07-31 23:20:02 UTC  

that'd be wild

2018-07-31 23:20:10 UTC  

What difference does it make

2018-07-31 23:20:16 UTC  

pun intended

2018-07-31 23:20:18 UTC  

obama > trump

2018-07-31 23:20:38 UTC  

me >>>>>>>>>>> Trump >>>>>>>>>>>> Obama

2018-07-31 23:20:39 UTC  

reverse card

2018-07-31 23:20:48 UTC  

Obama didn't do anything 🤷

2018-07-31 23:20:58 UTC  

of course he did

2018-07-31 23:21:12 UTC  

He decimated the Democratic party

2018-07-31 23:21:19 UTC  

lmao

2018-07-31 23:21:25 UTC  

he lowered unemployment by over 4%, trumps gotten it around .2%

2018-07-31 23:21:33 UTC  

Weakest its been since 1920

2018-07-31 23:21:36 UTC  

GDP reached 5%

2018-07-31 23:21:43 UTC  

lol

2018-07-31 23:23:12 UTC  

**Roskam said the Obama "administration was the first administration that never had a whole year of 3 percent growth."
While Roskam’s claim is accurate when based on annual GDP growth figures between 2009 and 2016, there are other ways to look at the data, such as from one quarter to the same in the previous year. Doing so reveals economic growth has surpassed 3 percent during two periods of Obama’s presidency.
We rate Roskam’s claim Mostly True.**

2018-07-31 23:24:00 UTC  

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

2018-07-31 23:24:51 UTC  

@🅶🅾🅳 Thanks for playing though

2018-07-31 23:25:22 UTC  

"While Mr. Trump praised the 4.1 percent annual growth rate in the second quarter, the economy exceeded that level four times during the Obama presidency: in 2009, 2011 and twice in 2014.

In purely numerical terms, a larger shift took place in the second quarter of 2014, when the economy went from contracting by 1 percent to growing at a rate of 5.1 percent. "

2018-07-31 23:26:02 UTC  

And throughout the rest of Obama's 2 terms?

2018-07-31 23:27:45 UTC  

If his economic policies was such a winner, why did Hillary, the Dems, and other primary losers run on it and lose?

2018-07-31 23:29:00 UTC  

If his economic policies were good, why did the Dems run on his economy and lose during the midterms?

2018-07-31 23:29:32 UTC  

You do know the Dems were devastated under Obama's watch right?

2018-07-31 23:29:34 UTC  

well more people voted for them, and obama was elected twice, so...

2018-07-31 23:30:05 UTC  

lol ok

2018-07-31 23:31:06 UTC  

If this is what "well more people voted for them" looks like, then YIKES

2018-07-31 23:31:24 UTC  

well i was just stating facts, so

2018-07-31 23:31:29 UTC  

I am too lol

2018-07-31 23:31:44 UTC  

and your graph literally just shows seats lost, how does that make trump better than him

2018-07-31 23:31:48 UTC  

Obama was the single greatest time bomb for the Dems in almost forever