Message from @Exiled Sentinel
Discord ID: 509041950737956874
Egalitarianism though, is a completely different story entirely
I’m egalitarian soo uh
Intersectional feminism is pretty much just egalitarianism
Egalitarianism and feminism are completely and utterly diametrically opposed
Don't call yourself a Nazi if you are not a Nazi
Intersectional feminism is equality for all
Isn’t that kind of similar to egalitarianism?
Why would you insult yourself like that though?
Would you call yourself a feminist of any sort??
Idk man
It’s just the label and it phonetically sounds better and is easier to pronounce than egalitarian
We’re just lazy
But most of us intersectional peeps understand that we’re pretty much egalitarian
Who cares what you mean by it, it's demeaning and self depreciating. Just call yourself what you are. If you are the usual feminist (equality for women but not men) call yourself a feminist. If you want actual equality, you are egalitarian.
Ok fine, insult yourself that way if you really must
But if you are really egalitarian, why do you feel insulted when one threatens feminists? If you aren't an actual man hating feminist? Make up your mind, either you are grouped with feminists and get the heat for it, or you are grouped with people who truly believe in equality and shouldn't be hurt by anything said about feminists.
Yet again, any offense you take then is completely self inflicted
Congratulations for playing yourself
congrats, you wasted 10 minutes addressing a point which had no relevance whatsoever
21st century feminists have to be hated, unless your one from the developing or Islamic world
which I fully support
“ Why I’m investing 500 million in migrants “ by George Soros on The WSJ
Next time someone tells you that the George Soros stuff is just a conspiracy theory, show them this article. This is Soros himself explaining how he uses millions to flood countries with migrants “ willingly or not” and how “ harassing “ the “ private sector “ is critical. He also points out how closely he works with the UN
Original link https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-im-investing-500-million-in-migrants-1474344001
Archive link
http://archive.today/JwESt
dude is so far gone, its amazing
Problem is he is partially right. There is nothing wrong with LEGAL migrants...
boomer detected
Baby boomer?
What makes you say that?
"There is nothing wrong with LEGAL migrants..."
Except for the fact that most come in and get on welfare and still vote blue
And the fact that we don't need migrants
Do you know what a legal migrant is?
we need our native population to be encouraged to reproduce at a rate that sustains our own population
I do know what a legal migrant is
Someone who immigrates legally
Then you are completely high if you honestly believe what you said. Illegal migrants vote blue because blue supports them! Legal ones are just random people with their own opinions (red or blue) and plenty of them are actually either skilled or go to America to study. That is something that should make you happy, it brings potential economic growth to your sad little Muppet land.
I don't want or need people from other countries to bring "economic growth"
I don't want people from other cultures who refuse to assimilate
?
Second point is reasonable, first one is unforgivably retarded.
If legal immigration was simply people coming and studying that would be one thing
but it isn't
It's mostly people coming from third world countries that add very little to the country