Message from @deng
Discord ID: 440776280799969280
and things that are repeated empirically
across studies
are more likely to be true
Which is why facts will never change anyones mind
Nope.
you would think that's true, but it's not
simply because anyone can make a study say anything, and even if you encounter a study that violates your worldview....thats when cognitive dissonance kicks in
well if you took a stats course....
sounds likes thats your confirmation bias brss
It certainly might be!
Now you're catching on
this shit sounds gay
^thats cognitive dissonance
classic tell
if you encounter a study that violates your worldview you should assess it
It normally is triggered when you encounter a worldview that violates your own
and see if it uses proper methodology
and is repeatable
(if applicable)
And how do you know the information you're getting is accurate?
are you this retared
*retarded
we have methodology
repeatable studies
Unless you are an expert in the field....you can't use a study for anything because you don't have the context to be able to know whats going on
This isn't about the scientific method
are you just trying to make a post structuralism argument
This about things that matter to your day to day
like "Who are you voting for for president" and "where am I going to live at"
All of that is decided irrationally
Every time
not necessarily
Humans aren't rational beings. Our minds didn't evolve to see truth, they evolved to keep us alive
This is why you can have a Muslim who believes Muhammed went to heaven going to the grocery store with an atheist who doesn't believe any of that
rational can mean doing things that we feel are in our best interest
Who's right?
so ill vote obama because he will make me feel good
Things that you *feel*
thats rational
And that's where the irrationally kicks in