The first debater came really well prepared. Like, he was a smart guy who knew his stuff and was comfortable with logic and debate
The second debater was smart too
He knew as much as the other guy
okay but lets say the second guy knew jack shit
But then...the second guy stole the show when he made a joke about his opponent being bald
No hold on
The very second the topic was about that guy being bald...it wasn't so much that being bald is bad...its that the second debater made a joke
Humor is so so so persuasive
The second he had the audience laughing...he won
And the first debater afterwards was so frustrated
He was like "omg why didn't they listen to my arguments?"
And he realized later what happened after he talked to a guy I learned a lot from Scott Adams
The debater was Stefan Molyneux
yeah that guy is a fucking moron
Lol is he?
Or is that your cognitive dissonance kicking in?
See?
Tricky stuff
not cognitive dissonance but my bias
He's really not stupid, he just says a lot of disagreeable things
To you, that is
cognitive dissonance leads to a rationalization. Your rationalization was "I'm just biased"
He's not stupid
that's cog dis
I'll take that back
like, textbook
Oh
He's just wrong
on many accounts
So he's not stupid....but he's stupid enough to be wrong a lot?
that doesn't seem to make sense
Wrong in what way?
On issues of immigration
saying someone is wrong or stupid doesnt mean anything. Give examples
The lone penguin is back
Should've said waddled back
DAMN IT
Missed opportunity
Yep
damn
nice one though
