the person that say there is no legos in the box

are telling everyone else there are no legos in the box but you need to take that box away from that person because it might have legos in it. By force.

What if...

Ohshit i f9rgot to type

O.o

I thinkd i missbehaved a bit.

the people who say there are legos in the box say they have seen the legos because they have opened the box. But the people who say there are no legos have not looked in the box and call the people who say there are legos in the box liars. Now the people who say there are no legos call the leader of the people who say there are legos in the box (lets call him jim) a liar and say he is spreading lies about the box. The people who say there are legos in the box say no he isnt lieing about the legos because they to have seen the legos. But the people who say there are no legos in the box call the people who say there are legos in the box liars to and say they need to be punished for lieing about the box. The people who say there are legos in the box say callign them a liar because of somethign they themselves have not looked into is wrong and they shoudl change their way of thinking and look for themselves. But the people who believe there are no legos in the box say that the people who say there are legos in the box are being racist against them because they said they dont know what is in the box and therefore from their view point are calling themselves smarter then them.

So the people who believe there are no legos in the box call the others nazis and shout for violence agaisnt them because Jim has said that there are legos in the box and he somehow won the fight to be leader of the 2 peoples. So the people who say there are no legos in the box riot against Jim and the people who are with him. In the spratic riots people are hurt(some badly) by the people who believe that there are no legos in the box because the leaders of the people who believe there are no legos in the box said that that Jim and his followers said there are legos in the box and are lieing to everyone and calling the people that believe there are no legos in the box to be less then them because they said they are wrong. and so we arrive at today.... the people who believe there are no legos in the box call for violence agaisn the people who say there are legos in the box. https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/maxine-waters-political-violence/ https://www.huffingtonpost.com/jesse-benn/sorry-liberals-a-violent-_b_10316186.html

I give you the how many times we can type "people who believe there are (not) legos in the box" simulater...... I should of copy pasted... woudl of been less time.

Jesus i thought messagss just werent showing for me

lol

do you think I summed it up genrally?

it its meh work but it was a spur of the moment thing.

Let me read it. It's pretty long.

Yeah you summed it up well

Im lost on what the legos are but you summed it up well

there is where the lego part is

LiberalFascistToday at 7:43 PM
Because I haven't seen any evidence to suggest that they are.
JJP007 (MEME WIZARD)Today at 7:43 PM
simply because they are not brought up or?
LiberalFascistToday at 7:43 PM
Yes, that is logical.
If I give you a box, and say it is full of lego. Yet there is no evidence to say that that box is full of lego, Then it is logical for you to assume that there is no lego in that box.
If there is no evidence for something it is probably not true

K g2g for a bit... see you in a while

Ohh

All those words about legos.... smh

lol

well

they do hold everything together now dont they?

Not really

the Lego movie says otherwise

It also calls a glue cap the magical piece of resistance

well I mean

they wernt wrong in their world it would be

;-;

Still they don’t hold everything together

in the lego world it does

How

its literaly make of legos. thats why its called the lego world

Yea but they can easily break apart

Hm

Who wanna be my friend

That’s a good question

Legos(like politics) can be both broken and assembled. But it is why they are broken and assembled that is the diffrence between the 2 sides of the political parties.

Ugh did you have to bring politics into it

that what this conversation started at is it not?