Message from @Anon365
Discord ID: 518214907292942347
In general or very specific outlets?
A mix of both
Weren't they against him because of his colour or something? I might be wrong, that's all I know about him.
I doubt that's why though
Same
I think it's the media's strategy
Outlets really only go for what will give them good ratings
Exactly.
yes
Trump being the start of a new era of politicians, they are milking him with all they got
And recently, Trump's been their money maker.
Trump is a controversial figure
Of course he's gonna get coverage
He likes to troll the media, which I love about him.
92% negative coverage, that's gotta be a record
It probably is.
If Hillary had gotten elected, it could've been similar as she was controversial too.
But we will never know that
Hillary doesn't troll reporters
She'd be glorified.
As to that some news media outlets were faking the polls.
They were making her look like a savior in the polls.
But yes, they would find things to pick with her too.
Hillary may have been a somewhat controversial figure, but nowhere near as Trump
I agree
Every politician is going to be controversial to somebody
The media would be against her, but not like Trump today.
She wouldn't troll them because she was trying to make herself look like such a hero.
I don't think trump complaining about the media is what got the media against him
Hahhaha
It comes from Fox News
CNN, sounds about right
Not the best option
Clinton news network.
well who else is going to report it? lmao
CNN?
Good point
At least now the people aren't easily influenced by the media.
Hilary would be the president if so.
