Damn male-exclusionary radical feminists. 😦

MERFs.

Ouf

Yeah but they go together because they're all oppressed more in the sense than it is "oh Trans isn't a sexuality" and it's typically TERFs who run that bullshit

It does and it doesn't. I think the inclusion of Trans into the LGBT has created a lot of confusion around what being Trans is

I'd say SAGA is enough, but I already forgot what the last a meant

It hasnt, the problem is assholes who think there should be a gender/sexuality for EVERY MINISCULE thing

Ughh

Soy America Great Again?

If it is to them fine

Just don't shove it down others throats

I think it has. Because as far as I'm concerned gender dysphoria = trans

Unless they consent.

otherwise. no. sorry.

Like, imma be demiromantic pansexual according to them, but I don't give a shit

I mean, romance is tricky now a days

"You don't need gender dysphoria to be trans."

like what the fuck does that even mean

@Scythe fuck that

But. like that literally is what being trans is

@Syenite Sye! <3

You need dysphoria to be fucking trsns

Another one is non-binary trans. Doesn't trans mean transitioning from one gender, to the other?

Like if I were biologically male and I painted my nails and maybe wore hair clips some lil soy bitch would be like "UwU Soft Demi-Girl UwU" like some idiot on instagram tried to give me some wack ass label on the "asexuality-spectrum" because I prefer to get closer to a partner before I let anything else happen due to some previous bad experiences

Like no stupid, IM JUST GAY

Eh depends

Ik trans people irl and i've seen trans on tv openly saying fuck the trans community and lgbt because of its cancer

@Scythe Yes. Plus people can't define non-binary which is why people cant get behind/support it

@Locus christ that article

Social dysphoria is a thing

@Lao LAO

<333

<3

Hello

the article makes me think of charlies uncle on it's always sunny @Lao

So is body dysphoria

Wtf is social dysphoria

The new terms of service explicitly states, “Discussions related to child sexual exploitation as a phenomenon or attraction towards minors are permitted.”

The new rule adds gray legalistic language that such pedophile content is allowed “provided they don’t promote or glorify child sexual exploitation in any way.”

Being unable to define non-binary sounds like YouTube being unable to define what harassment and hate speech is.

which is why it's so important TO GET A DIAGNOSIS

"THIS IS ART IT IS TASTEFUL"

fucking stoopid ass people