No they didn't

Not Muhammad anyway

He didn't leave a mark by religion

Or at least were prime examples for character

Mohammed was always known to be a honest man

He even joined a local meccan group before Islam by about 20 or 30 years

Which were basically the equivalent of the red Cross

The oppressed get their rights back and the oppressors wouldn't have a very nice day

He left a mark, by starting an Arabic revolution, which spread its imperialism throughout the MENA region and his followers continued to spread said religion by the sword

Do you know how Islam spreaded in the areas like Indonesia and Bangladesh?

In the end they all are just paths to our search for the unknown above us

Tell me

Because you will definently know not everywhere was opened by the sword, not even diplomatic pressure, or economic one

Merchants and traders basically

I never said they did everywhere

You definently implied thou

But they definitely did in the majority of places

Yeah I did

We can't argue that

Cause we cannot argue the minority

But it wasn't as common as people Believe

We don't Just yeet everybody at first sight

In that way, you can say the Nazis were legible, because the axis powers agreed with them, and a lot of people around still believe in that idealogy

Ofc you don't

But by religion, you should

Especially the ones that apostate

Except The Nazis mostly kept people in line through the firing line

Also

It's made a law in most of middle east

Most Nazi Supporters were not into the discrimination against jews

So what?

Most definitely agreed for the reconstruction of Germany

And you can't blame them

Just because you are not into one part of said idealogy, you still support it as a whole?

That is hypocrisy

Not as a whole of course

This is how malice spreads

If I was a German in the 1930s I would supported the reconstruction of Germany

This is literally from your ethics

"support one part, and you support everything"

Why you so passive aggressive m8