Message from @overrated
Discord ID: 673501518447640607
just because something is awful doesn't mean you have to portray it in the most pornographic way possible
True
and it's always said that they're just trying to "show you how bad it is"
then the after effects like trauma see 0 screen time
No but the crime of rape is in itself so offensive that any conversation broaching the subject is tainted by immediate malevolence
True
yes it's going to piss people off period
but it doesn't mean you should make it as foul as possible
i don't need to see 40 seconds of rape in a movie to get the point
You don't have to go out of your way to make rape a foul thing
I'd say explicit consent while being sober throughout the sexual act is key
it's obviously inherently foul and disgusting
The cold hard facts
but the way writers and directors frame it as of recent
is fetishistic
Nice play on words
"Writers" and "directors" aren't artists anymore, they are ideological proxies for the extreme left wing that has permiated general culture
yes
it's definitely due to an agenda
i 100% believe they're trying to desensitive people to rape
full of pedos
I believe they are trying to do the opposite
Sensitive the public?
How do you mean?
Wut
I believe they are trying to confront as many people as possible with the immediate disgusting heinous act of rape, just to bring home the point of how vile rape is and how we don't do enough to counteract rape in general culture
That's what I believe
I think the present agenda is to abolish rape culture worldwide
Exactly
not at all lol
How??
they don't focus on the negative effects of it half as much as using it as a story selling point
I mean here
think of it this way
Steven crowder change my mind
People.dont show the rape scenes anymore to respect the victims
They show the aftermath of such events instead of graphically showing it
the aftermath is 100% more important
They show the victims as survivors instead of some sullied property
it's very important they focus on the effects, but american writers?