Message from @JUMBALUMBA2000
Discord ID: 627345068424167435
Imagine in a future a Ally becomes our enemy but owns alot of the U.S.?
Chyyyna
Congress can not serve two masters.. the people and corporate/special interests. huh I wonder where that concept even comes from....
$$$
The source document (U.S. copnstitution) is how they got in, right?
Money talks BS walks
Power and $$
China bought our port , right?
Trump took that back
@ShadowBoxer the Bible. you can't serve to masters. choose wisely.
Originally yes, but I understand POTUS forced China to sell or relinquish ownership
China got the right to manage certain ports...they didn't buy the port(s)
I is back
hey there @JUMBALUMBA2000
Hey @JUMBALUMBA2000
How you all doin'
hiya @JUMBALUMBA2000
why did we give them money then @Groot for said port?
I am doing surprisingly well.. @JUMBALUMBA2000 and yourself?
@ShadowBoxer I'm not sure what u are referring to but I would guess liquidated damages for breaking the port contracts.
Contracts go away with sale or change of ownership?
I remember the uproar when China won the bid to manage the port of LA/Long Beach...
Clinton sold us out back then
So under said management can I get my people in the U.S. that are hackers?
We got a problem with the source doc... Our constitution... Just my humble opinion.
😮
@ShadowBoxer Perhaps the troubles stem from incorrect interpretations ?
No...multi tasking like a dumbass
Or they could be immoral contracts and no one is watching.
Not yet...but temp is falling fast
propane up and runnning?
🍂
r those fallen leaf ear rings NOT
Contracts are contracts moral or not...those who enforce those contracts know the difference in the moral issues but money changes that answer thinking no one would question validity.
ear rings? no that is representing ... "temps falling fast"
We can not serve money @KLATU and the human (The two masters) as money was written into the constitution as entity which thereby eats up things like Social security under softened terms. It eats itself in greed.
Right @Ron Ward. The point I meant was immoral contracts are not valid or enforceable....... but if no one says anything how would anyone know is to your point right?
Exactly how Bill Clinton got away with it