Message from @GG Allin
Discord ID: 545674614010019860
but regardless
can we all agree
that standard male circumcision shouldn't be compared to botched circumcisions
Yep, circumcision should not be compared to botched ones
i REALLY hate it when MRAs say "all circumcisions are botched"
make me rage tbh
But they should be compared to fgm thogh
@Suzaku Kururugi no it should be the choice of the persons whose body is being altered.
and im sure we can agree
the law should be changed to allow people botched to sue as adults
or automatically award them money
It should be the man choice, not the parents.
Every circumcision hinders the full experience of sexual pleasure.
to some extent sure
I've had to have reconstructive surgery to try and fix what circumcision did to me.
but some of us were seriously botched and it shouldn't be compared to a standard circumcision
were you botched?
All circumcision on infants is mutilation.
It’s wrong to compare the two so why are you doing so? @Suzaku Kururugi
Yes, I am botched. To me all men circumcised as infants are botched though because more is taken than if allowed to do it as an adult. If a adult chooses they can keep their frenulum and decided on how much mobile skin to keep. As a infant that choice is not there.
you were really botched
There is more harm done as a infant.
yo man im sorry if you were botched
i feel your pain
we should be able to sue
We do but our statute of limitations runs out when we turn 20 I believe. I never knew I had that option.
oh shit
fuck
im 31
fuck fuck fuck
I could have gotten like 10,000
or more
Look up David Llewellyn a attorney for ARC he may be able to give you advice.
well statutes of limitations ran out for sure by now
im pretty sure the guy who did it is dead
I'd wouldn't mind the money, but would rather the butcher lose their job.
Well I only want money.
Did you lose your glans?
I'm currently trying to get my local government to extend protections to boys.