simple really....

It’s simply inconsistent

Everything religious must be given a free pass according to that mate

well like i said

i think the line needs to be drawn somewhere, of course

Exactly @Indigo

but i don't think circumcision crosses the line

What's the difference between fgm and mgm

one is required by multiple religions, one isn't

that's the difference

Does that mean that one must be legal and the other illegal

Yes.

Other practices are “required” by multiple religions yet made illegal.

yes but at the end of the day

standard male circumcision

is no problem

botched circumcisions on the other hand, are a problem

and like i said i think the laws should be changed and should allow those who were botched to sue as adults

Botched fgm is the only problem

or automatically award them money

Quite ignorant to make this assertion without considering numerous sources that demonstrate the opposite

@Suzaku Kururugi fgm is required by the Dawoodi Borha sect of Islam.

Dawoodi *Bohra

If you have laws against one and not the other that is discrimination.

im not familiar with that sect of islam, i'd have to look into it

Look up the Detroit Fgm case.

but regardless

can we all agree

that standard male circumcision shouldn't be compared to botched circumcisions

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/21/health/fgm-female-genital-mutilation-law.html

Yep, circumcision should not be compared to botched ones

i REALLY hate it when MRAs say "all circumcisions are botched"

make me rage tbh

But they should be compared to fgm thogh

@Suzaku Kururugi no it should be the choice of the persons whose body is being altered.

and im sure we can agree

the law should be changed to allow people botched to sue as adults

or automatically award them money

It should be the man choice, not the parents.

Every circumcision hinders the full experience of sexual pleasure.

to some extent sure