was the worst of the two things

now given that's the case

if you ban male circumcision

society will look at is as

"if you can ban something as trivial as male circumcision then we need to ban hate speech!!!"

People have misguided priorities everywhere

It's just that circumcision is a body autonomy issue

That makes us against it

i understand the argument

And that's why MRAs are creating more awareness about mgm

but what it comes down to is

my concern for slippery slope

Also

I don't benefit from banning circumcision

so even if the risk of slippery slope is 1 percent

The boys of the future would though

that's too high because the benefit to me is zero

well it's a difference of outlook i suppose

the way i look at it is

the world is against me

so i need to act 100 percent in my own rational self interest at all times

I'm not sure there's much of a slope on this one, personally. With hate speech it's a very slippery one indeed. The UK wants to ban misogyny too.

well fuck the UK

honestly my suggestion to anyone in that shithole 1984 dystopia is to leave

which is kind of ironic

Only as an add-on to other crimes (i.e. anything with a male suspect and a female accusor)

because george orwell was from there

You don't benefit from banning MGM?

@Suzaku Kururugi He was indeed.

So that's why you don't want to ban it

What the fuck bro

In fact, his book has been held up in Parlement at least onc

I can't believe what I just read

why not?

Are you male?

Yes.

Then banning circumcision can only help you. Not personally but internally with the thought that you halted the companies that use foreskins in cosmetic creams. If the hospitals don't perform the procedure the cosmetic companies cannot easily acquire their raw materials

Don't you want to live in a world where we aren't harvested for lotion

But i dont care about that...

Your just a cold son of a bitch

Well...that's a fair assessment