Message from @Krille P.

Discord ID: 531248709342855214


2019-01-05 23:09:40 UTC  

yea, eliminating something before it becomes a threat

2019-01-05 23:09:58 UTC  

if someone has expressed clear intent to seriously harm you and you’ve got proof they’re willing to do so, go ahead.

2019-01-05 23:10:01 UTC  

extinguishing the fire before it becomes a wildfire

2019-01-05 23:10:20 UTC  

so you wait until it affects you

2019-01-05 23:10:22 UTC  

How would you proof such a thing? That's not clear cut

2019-01-05 23:10:33 UTC  

do you remember that quote in history class? about the nazis?

2019-01-05 23:10:37 UTC  

it’s not clear cut with government, either.

2019-01-05 23:10:48 UTC  

"First they came for X, and I didnt say anything because im not X"

2019-01-05 23:10:54 UTC  

What about people running around shooting people under the guise of self defence?

2019-01-05 23:11:01 UTC  

"Then they came for Y, and I didnt say anything because im not Y"

2019-01-05 23:11:10 UTC  

That's not an argument tard, answer my question

2019-01-05 23:11:12 UTC  

"Then they came for me, and there was no one left to defend me"

2019-01-05 23:11:31 UTC  

that’s where society and such are responsible

2019-01-05 23:11:43 UTC  

Using violence so they don't be "Coming for X" is a defense.

2019-01-05 23:12:04 UTC  

“First they came for X” is the exact moment you’re allowed to shoot em’

2019-01-05 23:12:06 UTC  

Can you speak coherrently instead of some mumbo-jumbo?

2019-01-05 23:12:19 UTC  

Can 3 of you not ask questions at the same time?

2019-01-05 23:12:29 UTC  

But they are related

2019-01-05 23:12:32 UTC  

yes

2019-01-05 23:12:38 UTC  

they still don’t have the same answer

2019-01-05 23:12:42 UTC  

r8ed

2019-01-05 23:12:57 UTC  

Kazimir remember, this is serious only

2019-01-05 23:13:06 UTC  

Ye gotcha

2019-01-05 23:13:13 UTC  

Then write three answers, gosh, is it really that hard for you?

2019-01-05 23:13:20 UTC  

water, you do realize the purpose of the state is to protect the people right?

2019-01-05 23:13:20 UTC  

Anyway, I don't like the Christian Vikerness definition of "self-defense", and believe self-defense actually needs to be direct.

2019-01-05 23:13:26 UTC  

and they use violence to do so

2019-01-05 23:13:41 UTC  

which should be perfectly acceptable in your view

2019-01-05 23:13:49 UTC  

i can specifically address your individual points, but making 6 points while i’m in the middle of an answer doesn’t help.

2019-01-05 23:14:18 UTC  

i’m okay with private cops, which have already proven themselves cheaper and more effective.

2019-01-05 23:14:29 UTC  

.......

2019-01-05 23:14:31 UTC  

but the only authority they have is to act in the defense of others.

2019-01-05 23:14:58 UTC  

youre starting to sound like someone who just wants to smoke weed

2019-01-05 23:15:30 UTC  

i want all drugs to be legalized.

2019-01-05 23:15:34 UTC  

Whats the problem with the state protecting people

2019-01-05 23:15:36 UTC  

from themselves?

2019-01-05 23:16:16 UTC  

If the government knows best, why don’t they control every aspect of your life?

2019-01-05 23:16:40 UTC  

@Water well good luck defending against an outside nation when your populace is degenerated because of all of these legal things

2019-01-05 23:16:43 UTC  

The slippery slope fallacy is a fallacy exactly because you don't need to go down the slope.

2019-01-05 23:16:53 UTC  

@PunishedMuskovy v ie t nam

2019-01-05 23:17:02 UTC  

yes