I'm just saying it's not sustainable

I disagree

you're arguing from an idealogical perspective, so I wont try to change your view

nah

im not ideological about economics

if there was a more Darwinian form of Socialism, i might be for it

it's called if you dont work you dont eat

but most forms of it aren't even Sustainable in the short term

wut

the regimes collapse

because of active foreign subversion, fifth columns, and invasion/sanction

yeah

National syndicalism is based

sadly franco cucked to the monarchists and natcaps

Any Revolutionary ideology is stupid

heh

ok

any reformist ideology is stupid

There has to be a King, God's Law and then you Organize the Economy on a Regulated Capitalist basis.

lmao

bringing back a monarchy would require a revolution

there's no way any majority would vote for it

i don't care about voting

then you're a revolutionary rather than a reformist

I'm a Reactionary would be more Accurate

>unironically being a reactionary

which would require

*a revolution*

if you dont do it through an existing system

and you do it through force

it is

*a revolution*

👍

i don't really care about that terminology

then don't say revolutionary ideologies are stupid and claim you dont care about voting

Revolution in my mind is bringing up something of a massive change that has never been tried or proven with a record..

based

but that isn't exactly what I'm doing

I'm for the Continuation of an Older Tradition

gay