we come to a consensus and than crush everyone who doesnt follow

to maintain the order

by aggression if necessary

if I have to inhale your smoke the government will defend me on my behalf

correct

Instead of me just shooting you for emitting smoke

well, thats another way

that I have to inhale

but we have monopoly of aggression

given to we hope wont betray us

Does might make right to you

no, if it did the state would be fine

The state operates on consensus

the original position

and might

to enforce the order

Fascism is the best way to run a state

the might is defensive in nature

I'm being defended by your emission

it needs might to enforce the will of the rulers and the consensus

you are the aggressor

not the state

you have offended my health

you're backwards

the state then provides a forum from which these issues can be legally resolved

settlement

the preferred solution

sounds democratic

and these principles can be extended to border security

your migration into a state creates a negative externality for everyone involved

is this a democracy

it's a racially homogeneous state

whatever the operating principle of the government it only works by consent of the governed functionally

If they dont revolt

than I suppose its agreement

read what I just wrote

you cant consent, theres no where you sign

this is civics 101

unless its da, but go live in the ocean

you can leave a state

the oceans will keep you safe