Message from @Angry.
Discord ID: 687318876308242501
<:chad:396569198404435969>
well it's bad because after national boundaries, there are limited boundaries left. there is an upper geographical limit. Like australia was the limit for aboriginals, the earth is the limit for humanity. if we remove genetic diversity across the nations, then we become a global blend. how is this so hard to understand?
cases in spain doubled in 1 day
https://youtu.be/LJ04O1Yz1So
Vote based Joe
500
the guy is awesome!
@Fellow Comrade what is your reason that a global blend is bad?
Trump was only awesome against Rosie O Donald <:virgin:396572545610022914>
again, the blending alone will not remove genetic diversity
because animals that are highly genetically similar have massive issues.
genetic diversity is not the same as racial diversity
you are talking about inbreeding
global blending will not result in inbreeding
dude you have downs.
what don't you understand?
the democrats are the REAL racists
I am the real racist
I've been found out
"why is it so bad to be a global blend?". are you serious right now? what makes you think that gene pool mixing in a limited area, doesn't result in a genepool that points in the direction of decreasing genetic diversity?
that's cultured thug's best moment
"No, I am the fash!"
one genepool, limited area, certain genes win and replicate.
bruh.
of course genetic diversity reduces.
i never asked about whether it's good or bad
i never made any claims about whether it's good or bad
bruh moment
define genetic diversity
you are making a claim about inbreeding
and you are just wrong about it
so come up with another reason for national borders
no.
social cohesion
if australian aborigines have problems with inbreeding, it's not for the reasons that you think it is
language preservation
one genepool, limited area, certain genes win and replicate. True or false?
cultural preservation