Message from @TuerSchlossEnteiser
Discord ID: 687318337130201165
like dude. my point is clear. global travel over the last couple hundred years has increased the intermixing and that is bad because it results in the destruction of national genetic boundaries that were more defined in the past. dude.
simple
simple af.
what's your reason for that being bad?
what's your reason for it being ok?
i'm not saying it's good or bad
i want to know your reason that it's bad
good thing I take zinc supplement
<:chad:396569198404435969>
well it's bad because after national boundaries, there are limited boundaries left. there is an upper geographical limit. Like australia was the limit for aboriginals, the earth is the limit for humanity. if we remove genetic diversity across the nations, then we become a global blend. how is this so hard to understand?
cases in spain doubled in 1 day
https://youtu.be/LJ04O1Yz1So
Vote based Joe
500
the guy is awesome!
@Fellow Comrade what is your reason that a global blend is bad?
again, the blending alone will not remove genetic diversity
because animals that are highly genetically similar have massive issues.
genetic diversity is not the same as racial diversity
you are talking about inbreeding
global blending will not result in inbreeding
dude you have downs.
what don't you understand?
the democrats are the REAL racists
I am the real racist
Ok, democrat
I've been found out
"why is it so bad to be a global blend?". are you serious right now? what makes you think that gene pool mixing in a limited area, doesn't result in a genepool that points in the direction of decreasing genetic diversity?
that's cultured thug's best moment
"No, I am the fash!"
one genepool, limited area, certain genes win and replicate.
bruh.
of course genetic diversity reduces.
i never asked about whether it's good or bad
i never made any claims about whether it's good or bad
bruh moment