lol

yes, nature creates freaks

no one claims it doesn't test things from time to time

like two headed goats or carlos mancia

What you're doing right now is "against human nature"

It's the memeiest argument ever

pervers

against human nature

it's the translation

And no I am not at all convinced that not following a leader is against human nature

Highly skeptical of it in fact

there are leaders in libertarianism

there are always leaders

that's why communism is fake

because there's a fake alternative media scene bombarding us with terms like sheepl

I don't see being a subservient slave that beneficial to having children

Maybe in certain environments

trust your elders, we have no reason poisoning those who have to take care of us at age

the idea in libertarianism is that following the leader is voluntary

everything is voluntary

Who's the leader in ancap

and in practice, liberalism is the closest to achieving such an illusion

libertarianism is fake like communism

the peopel with the most power

but just look at history

from tribe

to cities

to kingdoms

to empires

the person who makes decisions is the leader

Makes decisions about what

what other people do

whether the other people follow voluntarily or not

> libertarianism is fake like communism
@stem both ideas are totally valid in reasonable bordered spaces, like the almende was (that's where marx got in some parts his ideas from us christians)

Well ok there are natural born leaders if that's what you mean but there isn't a "leader" as in a nation leader

what's the difference?

the person whom others follow and who might use force to get others to follow

what is the real difference between following voluntarily and being coerced

a corporate manager has people do what he says partly because they need to make money and partly because they want to do what he says for whatever reason

same with national leaders

i mean, not the making money part