Message from @stem

Discord ID: 688409569273053312


2020-03-14 15:29:20 UTC  

Makes decisions about what

2020-03-14 15:29:27 UTC  

what other people do

2020-03-14 15:29:35 UTC  

whether the other people follow voluntarily or not

2020-03-14 15:30:19 UTC  

> libertarianism is fake like communism
@stem both ideas are totally valid in reasonable bordered spaces, like the almende was (that's where marx got in some parts his ideas from us christians)

2020-03-14 15:30:34 UTC  

Well ok there are natural born leaders if that's what you mean but there isn't a "leader" as in a nation leader

2020-03-14 15:30:53 UTC  

what's the difference?

2020-03-14 15:31:14 UTC  

the person whom others follow and who might use force to get others to follow

2020-03-14 15:31:33 UTC  

what is the real difference between following voluntarily and being coerced

2020-03-14 15:32:17 UTC  

a corporate manager has people do what he says partly because they need to make money and partly because they want to do what he says for whatever reason

2020-03-14 15:32:24 UTC  

same with national leaders

2020-03-14 15:32:29 UTC  

i mean, not the making money part

2020-03-14 15:32:34 UTC  

but maybe patriotism or whatever

2020-03-14 15:32:44 UTC  

and police force

2020-03-14 15:32:49 UTC  

taxes

2020-03-14 15:32:51 UTC  

You voluntarily signed a contract with the corporate manager and you can leave at any time

2020-03-14 15:32:59 UTC  

The difference is you didn't consent

2020-03-14 15:33:07 UTC  

That's like asking what's the difference between sex and rape

2020-03-14 15:33:11 UTC  

consent is only an emotion that you have

2020-03-14 15:33:25 UTC  

a way you feel about a decision

2020-03-14 15:33:43 UTC  

modern western nations are built on the idea of consent

2020-03-14 15:33:51 UTC  

and many people have felt that they were consenting to it

2020-03-14 15:34:01 UTC  

If you sign a document saying you consent to an action I'm pretty sure that's pretty much objectively accepted as you giving consent

2020-03-14 15:34:12 UTC  

what if you were starving?

2020-03-14 15:34:16 UTC  

Unlike a leader using force against you without any conractual agreements

2020-03-14 15:34:33 UTC  

what if all the property is owned by that guy

2020-03-14 15:34:35 UTC  

and you have none

2020-03-14 15:34:41 UTC  

then you have no choice but to work for him

2020-03-14 15:34:43 UTC  

Well ok are you going to get into semantics now

2020-03-14 15:35:03 UTC  

Obviously I don't mean that if someone points a gun at you and asks you to sign a document that is consent

2020-03-14 15:35:13 UTC  

I meant acting in good faith in all accounts

2020-03-14 15:35:36 UTC  

what if just by a series of accidents in a libertarian world, all the property ended up in the hands of one man

2020-03-14 15:35:43 UTC  

muh contractual consent is naive af

2020-03-14 15:36:14 UTC  

Again the crazy hypotheticals meme

2020-03-14 15:36:16 UTC  

Never ends

2020-03-14 15:36:35 UTC  

Dude do you know how many what ifs I could make about your system that you will never be able to find a solution towards

2020-03-14 15:36:43 UTC  

And realistic ones not crazy ones

2020-03-14 15:36:50 UTC  

Pointing to real life examples

2020-03-14 15:37:23 UTC  

since close to nothing moves in a reversed V formation in nature ... somewhat that following comes naturally

2020-03-14 15:37:38 UTC  

i'm using an extreme example but in real life you see wealth being redistributed all the time and not always for "good" reasons

2020-03-14 15:37:53 UTC  

not redistributed by the government

2020-03-14 15:38:00 UTC  

but just the distribution changing