they could discuss about peterson maybe?

wha?

that would be the biggest possible waste of time lol

https://twitter.com/StefanMolyneux/status/1238681697388048384

I think it would be funny,
discussing their thoughts on JBP

Noooo

Good? As in the eyes of the state?

yea they picked probably the best topic

That's the worst debate topic.

the one that differentiates them the most

no it's awesome

stop being a negatron

we get to see JF dunk on one of these moral realist retards

They should argue about nationalism or biology or anything but ethics.

and a big one at that

actually, I think any discussion, even on some simple topic is good to open the door to them communicating

wtf do they have to argue about nationalism

they will have little conflict on those fields

they are both race realist libertarians

AND canadians

oh noooo talking about morality so horrible

how dare you sir

the moralinos

really the two most substantive things they could discuss is ethics and tactics

Really they should argue about JQ, but Moly won't touch that topic with a 10 foot stick.

idk

they could approach it

jewish morality

JF not the best for that

there are people who are specialists

in JQ

kek specialists

afghans and pakis think its "good" and moral to f little boys.

is brainwash arguing with someone?

Jews think its moral and good to corrupt the masses

it's all part of their sexual education and upbringing

No

The debate topic

right, JF is just correct

there is no room for molytard to be correct

"universaly preferable behavior"
JF just has to prove that universal to one is not universal to another.. and can't be one rule for all