Message from @WarOfTheFanboys
Discord ID: 533326297666027532
I'd be crazy not to
It's not about rescinding anything. It's not about who is right or wrong. It's about getting woke..to the real world and how it runs
Who is q
I dont know
Boss how old are you btw?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHnGFkUS_lc
FAKE! FAKE! FAKE!
The More You Know…
Research for yourself.
Q
How is this cult like? It says..research for yourself...c'mon man..
I have a few questions about Q
I'm 42
Does he have access to top secret Gov docs?
I dont know..I think so..but the problem is that he cannot just disseminate top secret stuff..that's why its cryptic like..drop clues..bread crumbs..
There have been leaks in all governments in every country in the world for all of time.
If he did that, he'd be like Hillary
Never once have they come in form of parable.
Yes...but this administration has worked hard to stop leaks. Q doesn't leak, just drops clues..hints..its up to us to figure it out
And yes, people have been wrong
The purpose of Q is to get people thinking..opening eyes. The great awakening.
That's it..in a nutshell
and if Q is who you say he is
he could verify himself in a heartbeat
and people would be "greatly awoken"
I dont know who he/she is
okay i give up
i'm not interested in talking about Q anymore
if he releases proof, DM me
and I'll admit I was 100% wrong
>>1952489
We are waiting for a reporter to ask the ultimate question.
What are they waiting for?
They can end this at any time simply by asking POTUS, right?
We may have to ‘force’ this one.
Q
One last post
No reporter will ask
if they ask, what will trump do?
say yeah it's true?
or deny it
I believe he will confirm its true. That's why they wont ask
Let me propose a hypothetical
1) Reporter asks Trump if Q is real
2) Trump says huh? I've never heard of Q
3) Q says Trump can't admit it because they'll assassinate him/it will risk his plan/dues ex/etc
would you believe Trump or Q in this instance?
I hate hypotheticals. But in this case, if the question was asked and Trump denies it, I would definately re evaluate
I'm not blindly following
ok
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++