Message from @YUGE
Discord ID: 301477238820569088
Maybe not
Because I read that as "probability of f = .8903"
"Prob of chi2 = .8877"
There is nothing special about granger causality versus other hypothesis tests in stata.
So what should I interpret these outputs to mean?
Reject H0, right?
So, I read your results as failure to reject
Ah so I was reading it backwards
Yes, I agree with that. I think you have to accept H0 with those numbers because it doesn't meet the confidence interval.
FAILYRE TI REJECT
!!!
As the autiste said, .02 < .95
Not accept!
Roight
Oh yea
It's been 10 years
Kek
I was interpreting it like a p-value
Which was my big mistake
Just had to remember how to read
Thanks lads
Time to add more lag operators until this shit works
The Korean prof in the Towson economics dept knows his econometrics.
I think he has also taught that at UMD.
I wonder if it's the same prof I have
Dr. Kim?
Trying to get a full name for you
Hmmm doesn't appear to be at Towson anymore. Never mind.
@Nikephoros jeong-Joon Lee/JJ Lee
lol rly
Lmao it's real
wewewew
this timeline
Who here /wantstodie/
not me
where were you when sweden was kill
Kikes could publically dismember Trump while dancing around to Hava Magilla or whatever the fuck while stating that they're going to do the same to each and every one of them and boomers would clap.