I know it's disingenuous when you compare India to China but really, I fell that the Chinese people as a whole achieved a lot more and act better.

if you came to India

you would hate it

Maurya empire was pretty cool

yea, but as I said their ancient relics of the past, we don't act like our ancestors do

I pity them, they would be rolling in their graves rn if they saw India in its current state

I think over population is your biggest problem

corruption

also as much as I like Alexander

King Porus was pretty based

he almost raped him

I'm OK actually with Alexander

with elephants

but you know

after he died

Ptolomey took over Egypt

and the Ptolomies were fucking assholes

speaking of ptolemy, have you read Julius Caesar?

who subjugated Copts (Copt just means Egyptian, obviously we weren't Christian at this point but regardless it's an ethnicity, not a religion)

I see

Bello Gallico?

No, I haven't read it

I'm personally not into this whole race realism, ethnostates and nationalism thingy tbh

I mean, I'm more for ethnicity rather than race

for example

I think Pan-Africanism, or Pan-anything is retarded

races are social constructs anyway, look at the sykes picot agreement

Uh, no

I'd have to disagree

in that case

There's many biological differences

i mean in that case

Here's the skull of a Caucasoid vs a Tasmanian aboriginee

Clearly not just "social"

We have both genetic differences, each race differs

biologically

Different races are different sub-species, and I challenge anyone to prove me wrong

Well I know, but a lot of Arab and African states were carved out of artificial borders, pertaining to that context their social constructs

A Siberian tiger and Bengal tiger are both still tigers, but clearly distinct

but yes, your right

and classified as sub species