Message from @Runes
Discord ID: 513003670166831104
It's like a BAR or StG44 in WWII, except you can stick it on all your rifles
So by that metric, you want something that can fire whatever grenade you have for as little cost, weight, and ergonomic disruption as possible
Standalone launchers are niche weapons with few applicable roles, so fucking up your UBGL to make it ammo compatible with a standalone is fucking dumb.
Just make your standalone GL fire purpose built ammo out of a purpose built launcher like the Mikor MGL.
@RoflTank what about a modern BAR? Mag capacity at 20 or 25 to make things a little more easy on the guy that has to carry it, long barrel for standoff engagements, but in a round like 338 lapua to make up for the smaller mag size? The barrel and reciever would be steel to make sure its durable but other parts of the firearm could be made out of high durability polymer to help cut down on weight more
As a force multiplier I think it could work well. I don't intend it to replace the SAW for whatever nation chooses to adopt it so the spergs that are gonna come around and reeeeee about it not being belt fed can fuck off
But... the magazine size and the weight of the gun are some of the main reasons why the gun is obsolescent
That would be heavy as fuck
Also smaller mags add up over time compaired to just throwing belts in a nutsack pouch
These are the same kinda guys who thought bringing back the M14 for use in Afghanistan was a good idea
We had the EBR because we didnt have enough m110s to give out
Suggesting an open bolt box fed machine gun in 338lap is utter silliness
@Innaswamp and the EBR was a failure
It was so fucking shit
Also increasing the magazine size would make it even less useful, since it will get in the way in prone positions
More rounds of a bigger cartridge
The EBR was neat but ineffective
*neat*
*I like the M14 ok*
I know it’s bad and I shouldn’t but I like it
Muh battle rifle*
And Muh aesthetic
Don’t get me wrong almost anything since is better
I mean you can even argue the G43 (not the G41 the G41 is perfect the G43 was a late war rushed model) was better than the M14
The M14 is properly heat treated and won’t fuck it’s own gas system
The G43 also only holds ten rounds and has worse sights
It’s better than anything from the Second World War but not by much
>worse sights
that's a very opinionated statement
It’s harder to use tangent sights
I like them but for the average goon it’s easier to use an aperture
well yeah like I said it's very subjective and opinion based
Get your brain out of WW2 ya fuckin nerd
And the M14 is bad and you should feel bad
Yes and I do
@Reichtangle G43 sights are nice as fuck
Only a retard wouldnt be able to use them.
No they’re good
I like tangent sights, don’t get me wrong
But the aperture provides a generally better sight picture
This nigga can't use tangent sights lmao