Message from @urzu117

Discord ID: 543131188760412170


2019-02-07 18:06:27 UTC  

The technology is always advancing

2019-02-07 18:06:46 UTC  

Also they don't match a fraction of what coal and natural gas produce power wise

2019-02-07 18:06:47 UTC  

It’s not to the scale of replacing anything we currently use. Only supplementing.

2019-02-07 18:06:55 UTC  

Sure

2019-02-07 18:06:58 UTC  

Tbh I'd like more geo thermal power

2019-02-07 18:07:33 UTC  

The US is sitting on top of one the biggest volcanos on earth and they're just letting all that energy go to waste

2019-02-07 18:08:13 UTC  

New reactors using the latest designs would be good too

2019-02-07 18:08:16 UTC  

Geothermal at scale? Has anyone done that?

2019-02-07 18:08:23 UTC  

Iceland

2019-02-07 18:08:24 UTC  

Not really

2019-02-07 18:08:32 UTC  

But it's nowhere near the size of the US

2019-02-07 18:08:33 UTC  

Fuck dude Hawaii would be perfect testing

2019-02-07 18:08:40 UTC  

So it's a practical unknown

2019-02-07 18:08:43 UTC  

We desperately need to be putting R&D into more modern nuclear

2019-02-07 18:08:50 UTC  

And thus no one wants to sink money into ut

2019-02-07 18:08:52 UTC  

I want fusion reactors

2019-02-07 18:08:52 UTC  

It

2019-02-07 18:08:56 UTC  

But it’s such s political hot button

2019-02-07 18:09:04 UTC  

Thing is

2019-02-07 18:09:15 UTC  

I want nuclear. Fuck NIMBYs, yes in my backyard

2019-02-07 18:09:26 UTC  

Even hardcore anti-nuclear folks are coming around

2019-02-07 18:09:27 UTC  

Front yard too

2019-02-07 18:09:48 UTC  

So nuclear is becoming a partisan issue

2019-02-07 18:11:43 UTC  

We need stopgap reactors that can be built quickly with the latest safety designs built in until fusion can be deployed on a large scale

2019-02-07 18:12:09 UTC  

Fusion doesn’t exist tho

2019-02-07 18:12:43 UTC  

It does

2019-02-07 18:12:55 UTC  

But not on a >produces more energy than it took to start

2019-02-07 18:12:58 UTC  

Scale

2019-02-07 18:13:53 UTC  

Then it doesn’t exist

2019-02-07 18:14:03 UTC  

Or: it’s not power generation

2019-02-07 18:14:42 UTC  

Molten salt reactors are practically within arms reach

2019-02-07 18:15:15 UTC  

And they don't need uranium to burn, just enough to start the reactor

2019-02-07 18:15:33 UTC  

Molten salt is already a functional technology.

2019-02-07 18:15:50 UTC  

Doesn't mean it's commercially successful

2019-02-07 18:15:52 UTC  

The Russians were using lead-bismuth eutectic reactors in the Alfa class back in the Cold War

2019-02-07 18:15:58 UTC  

Which is where it needs to be

2019-02-07 18:16:15 UTC  

They put out shitloads of energy in a tiny package, and propelled the Alfa to ludicrous speeds

2019-02-07 18:17:17 UTC  

I mean shit, most Gen III plants already have the infrastructure for relatively simple Gen IV retrofits.

2019-02-07 18:18:50 UTC  

Also, I'd like to point out that molten salt reactors do require a constant amount of radioactive isotope to keep the "molten salt" part hot. It's just that the fluid acts as the moderator and poison all at once, so you can just dump some neutron activated thorium in there and let it go.

2019-02-07 18:19:15 UTC  

And since you can use thermoelectric conversion, you don't need a high pressure water core to generate steam

2019-02-07 18:19:45 UTC  

Then as the isotope decays, you pump it through a different loop until you get some pretty harmless waste by the end of you 4+ loops