Message from @urzu117

Discord ID: 547214776330223647


2019-02-19 00:29:01 UTC  

There's the USAAF, the USAAB the USNAF, and the USMCA all saying what the fuck they want, but only 1 contract

2019-02-19 00:29:30 UTC  

honestly the USAF should just be in charge of air superiority. Nothing else.

2019-02-19 00:29:38 UTC  

They make fighters and shoot down planes.

2019-02-19 00:29:45 UTC  

NORAD handles strategic bombers

2019-02-19 00:29:47 UTC  

dont forget bombers

2019-02-19 00:30:03 UTC  

Nah, leave bombers to the individual branches

2019-02-19 00:30:07 UTC  

Strategic =/= Tactical

2019-02-19 00:30:14 UTC  

They can tailor them to their mission profiles

2019-02-19 00:30:38 UTC  

Does the Army operate any fixed wing aircraft?

2019-02-19 00:30:44 UTC  

I think so

2019-02-19 00:31:15 UTC  

But seriously, CAS/tac bombing should be left to the branch in question, with the Marines inheriting the USNAF.

2019-02-19 00:31:23 UTC  

So basically just bring back the USAAC

2019-02-19 00:31:43 UTC  

Then the USAF just has to worry about maintaining air superiority

2019-02-19 00:31:59 UTC  

And the USAAC/USNAF handle the ground support

2019-02-19 00:32:29 UTC  

those generals would never give it up

2019-02-19 00:32:55 UTC  

"BUT MUH BUDGETS REEEEEEE"

2019-02-19 00:33:07 UTC  

The USAAB only has EW fixed wing aircraft currently

2019-02-19 00:33:50 UTC  

***psssssst, that means electronic warfare***

2019-02-19 00:34:03 UTC  

Hmmm, I just found a problem. Do SEAD runs fall under ground support or air superiority?

2019-02-19 00:35:21 UTC  

Depends on who you ask and where

2019-02-19 00:36:09 UTC  

ground support to establish air superiority

2019-02-19 00:36:35 UTC  

Well in the context of a restructured USAF/USAAC/USNAF, would it fall to the ground pounders or the fighter jockies to do SEAD?

2019-02-19 00:36:57 UTC  

I mean urzu has a point

2019-02-19 00:37:29 UTC  

It's a ground target, but then again, to establish true air superiority you need to push beyond the AO of the ground support to proactively intercept enemy fighters

2019-02-19 00:40:18 UTC  

Hell it's redundant

2019-02-19 00:40:19 UTC  

You're aware the U.S Army still has a minor air corps with Apaches

2019-02-19 00:40:38 UTC  

And the USMC has its own entire *wing*

2019-02-19 00:41:08 UTC  

The USMC MAGTAF/MEU system gives us everything from bombers to transport to attack and support helicopters. Not even including all of our jets.

2019-02-19 00:41:36 UTC  

You know, that branch dedicated to Amphibious landings when the largest amphibious landing in history was done by the U.S Army

2019-02-19 00:41:42 UTC  

<:TamamoDab:483459011463741451> <:tamamodab2:485506018227257346>

2019-02-19 00:57:03 UTC  

honestly

2019-02-19 00:57:09 UTC  

SEAD duties fall onto the air force

2019-02-19 00:57:19 UTC  

because they got the anti-radiation missiles

2019-02-19 00:59:07 UTC  

army could develop modified MANPAD's that can fire anti-rad missiles

2019-02-19 00:59:35 UTC  

but the point of the missile is to engage radar air defences from long range without being detected

2019-02-19 00:59:48 UTC  

might as well just walk up to the radar system and put on some c4

2019-02-19 00:59:52 UTC  

at that point

2019-02-19 01:01:16 UTC  

@Punished Ggnome lets be real tho when was the last time the Marines actually did the job they were created for? WWII? Korea?

2019-02-19 01:01:35 UTC  

I mean the USMC is basically the Army in different camo nowadays

2019-02-19 01:02:15 UTC  

More like stormtroopers. The USMC wins battles, Army wins wars.

2019-02-19 01:02:23 UTC  

We've seen this with Somalia handover and Fallujah handover.