Message from @kampfersturm
Discord ID: 500189969994874880
looks like those crazy old 4 gauge shotguns the Brits used to use to slam-dunk shit in the Boers
or the KS-23 how could I forget
I’m convinced the KS stands for “Kommando Special”
You can’t tell me otherwise
“Ivan what are you doing with no good shvak barrel”
“Of shuttings up dimitri, yuo will see”
Karabin Spetsialniy
or "Special Carbine"
so same thing really
the KS-23 is grea
also probably born from "These rifles grenades are of puny, I want to be launchings entire F-1"
I love these guns
Two Mac 10’s, a whack rifle, a fancy shotgun and a 1919A6
Beautiful.
>Vraksian renegade arms
Oh no, its a heresy
Looks like a mix
A inbred hybrid
I like it
Never liked the E-100, really. Super heavy tanks are autistic.
Yours is a nice model though
Superheavies are the future, tbh
Any tank not large enough to mount a full CIWS suite is going to be fodder.
Imagine an E-100 hull with a Krupp turret (KT Henschel turret scaled up for a 128-150mm gun), lifted slightly to fit like 4 20mm pancake turrets around the base. The turret has a 20mm fast-track oscillating turret for CIWS, and a total frontal armor physical thickness of nearly 1000mm, at least 500mm side and rear physical thickness. With nanoalloy composites and nanoceramic panels, effective protection goes up to 2500mm+, multi-layer shaped charge ERA renders even tandem or triple charge HEAT worthless along with long-rod penetrators.
post pic pls
those models make me wow
I fuckin love whacky projects though
The Kugelblitz etc
I’ve espoused my love for the Panzer IV W
Goddamn it
I think the Löwe or E75 would have been better than the E100
And modernized, they'd beat the hell out of a T14 Armata
found the retarded wehraboo
“Muh modernized 1940’s technology is better than Abrams”
Gee fucking whiz let’s see how solid AP penetrators perform against modern composite and reactive armour, and how that solid rolled homogenous steel performs against Mach 5 tungsten rods